IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Massive batch of probably-editorial nits (#3805)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Fri, 10 July 2020 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0623A0914 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ji1wwTy7RYHX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E0F3A091B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED199E183B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1594412219; bh=kXP/MvW9EGfRw/qVOmBlrRFROs/84lsg42mbDv5OYgU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=X0l6v3bhBCRrp94dcpBjRDyolgwvQnp/QE+p507lforbCfDdr7kW31vROAoI7An6C e3mDQKkokY1vWFoHt9qOHAtLYySavhs1TW1IZWUMrkq+dnBphsNOma0R24dbjyJPNh 2VeW1yjuVkThE9x48lGa4T8Uql+igLUXNL/kvqwc=
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:16:59 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZ7FUGZAJTH7SA4RSV5CSW3XEVBNHHCNKDJHI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3805/review/446676811@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3805@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3805@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Massive batch of probably-editorial nits (#3805)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f08ccbbcefd5_55363fa30cacd96c2083b3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_1Rfn40km_2Fqe_nh1iGbAhihFU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:17:02 -0000

@MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> @@ -4008,8 +3992,8 @@ off-path injection as specified in {{!RFC8201}} and Section 5.2 of {{!RFC8085}}.
 This validation SHOULD use the quoted packet supplied in the payload of an ICMP
 message to associate the message with a corresponding transport connection (see
 Section 4.6.1 of {{!DPLPMTUD}}).  ICMP message validation MUST include matching
-IP addresses and UDP ports {{!RFC8085}} and, when possible, connection IDs to an
-active QUIC session.  The endpoint SHOULD ignore all ICMP messages that fail
+IP addresses and UDP ports ({{!RFC8085}}) and, when possible, connection IDs to

Ah, while I'm looking at the text output and saying "'UDP [UDP]' looks a bit strange; let's fix that."

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3805#discussion_r453058144

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email