Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 24 April 2018 01:42 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A1D12DFE0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cIv-kajdKVgq for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B0191205F0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=0GIK4QVYr8CxyPuQB3/bKt5FthE=; b=T1JgbijLa7R7dDgS /7R1oYXcYH4AhM+KNs7SMmJs/v7kg1pI2G1QggJXSMiFx3YXS2jCd3duk6a6bHDi YKHdThn/RT2nBGZ3JaRN0stf7H0AkEx/Rw/Y0r98tFh24SthafgbogyvIxLmiSGu QfVfDLCH3Nt/mzUtgi2jVEhmxog=
Received: by filter0437p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0437p1mdw1-15309-5ADE8B68-42 2018-04-24 01:42:00.901614248 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) by ismtpd0042p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 7wBfjiRETw296mbqT1IB2A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 01:42:00.820 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 01:42:00 +0000
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0dbc6c0e429c625c98399ece3d368f6ecade7cb292cf0000000116f64d6892a169ce12c973b1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296/383775712@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ade8b688beff_5fc63f96fab18f841045b1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3UuQc3wmMBTSWvsbPlVUaIriJ3PmnTpYXbwF zW3HJhmcMd1jOH1TA2rz69MQt6TSmuX9vX1vGTPlOiXtQrjzn5wnv01cn90pnBs1SgdB430TURh/uD FEsatggWhuWO2z/B1I6HH8FGD2KFK0DPupPPyX54OL9ovKeEznOM2ZoG/kARM+3PFpt03RoCv5FNVC U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aSsQ9Ii9meYeackcuqbVxlZ7HnI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 01:42:05 -0000
It occurs to me that you can always encrypt PN on long headers, and negotiate the transform for short headers. This ensures that a transform is negotiated for the performance-driving case, at the same time avoiding ossification issues for early packets. But yes, there might be a new PN space for the handhshake, which will make this easier to handle. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296#issuecomment-383775712
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … borisPis
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform shou… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … bobdug
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … ianswett