IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifying "the same server" (#3155)

Nick Harper <notifications@github.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A4A12008A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sm66CxGmz3Go for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601FE12006B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.84]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8D96E1459 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572300191; bh=RksDqcUnp1G5mDT/1DhHLNuvxOExrowHFGXu9zUTzYk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=uau206fOFKev4icbyoIHYfk2HbfKF9IyQ8ZqC8PYY2d6WMY3pxcnU5GPuwj5sYSwk nv4FuYFcxRGLaEL8g5sDFZxwHKN1PjFqp/trwNBP6/GG3g3Zx5hP2/v8nD0EX5Lkyz JN6Gvs4nDIoGAM9Ah3qdkngZouoOFcUKoi6gUNOU=
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:03:11 -0700
From: Nick Harper <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7QFKGYSA72ZSE76GF3YSTC7EVBNHHB5FITQM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155/547165008@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifying "the same server" (#3155)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db7659f700cd_57383fe9b3ccd9681035d6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nharper
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dk7WZ6jy3dorXBza2h3yj73cK7M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:03:14 -0000

Agreed, it's a performance concern, not a security concern. If the client sends an unreadable token, worst case is the server sends a Retry packet and we burn a round trip.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155#issuecomment-547165008

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email