Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifying "the same server" (#3155)
Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 11:43 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398211200D7
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 03:43:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id C3GOMpONwJnM for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 4 Nov 2019 03:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46A81200BA
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 03:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-c53a806.ac4-iad.github.net
(github-lowworker-c53a806.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.45])
by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78176A045B
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 03:43:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1572867803;
bh=Gf+l0LOJJBSNPrYMAGlwTsSe9FRqBw9VY/M1Pd/u7kE=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=y0CjlhaHPqzIj1d1c8RuEdX2DyxTO0yB3LR4fd/z2oUuGzy7k712hYObOpVM7HAUw
0YigPPmNJUk1nYU6BBqi0k36bn4kDas/r21jp957FLLGdB6t9AAxf05ez35phVC1ry
femLyq5Q7Mhzs7RUtFRmma3cqf8W0AmqCmk7xLAc=
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 03:43:23 -0800
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJK6P4PZ4M3GKEVZN5WF3ZVAVXEVBNHHB5FITQM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155/549318400@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifying "the same server"
(#3155)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc00edbc95e7_492f3fe9686cd96411562c";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vYW76ltF81ICg3vyI3KhkegGeo8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 11:43:26 -0000
@kazuho If gateway does not have the keys, it has no more info than a multi-CDN case. In fact, it has less info -- it cannot tell when the new connection is for the same or different hostname than the one that issued the token. I am interested in anyone presenting a material reduction in privacy in case (a) that is absent in a multi-CDN case with case (c). (I am not aware of a way to prove lack of privacy concerns other than making an attempt to find some and falling to do so). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3155#issuecomment-549318400
- [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifying "t… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Nick Harper
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Nick Harper
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] The method of identifyin… Martin Thomson