Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, post-Cupertino

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

With the exception of #2863 (where we'll continue discussion), consensus declared.

Cheers,

> On 22 Oct 2019, at 11:42 am, Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them next week.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #3097: Is CONNECTION_CLOSE ACK-eliciting?
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3097>
> 
> * #3085: Stateless reset detection should be datagram-based
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2993>
> 
> * #3054: Label for key updates
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3050>
> 
> * #3046: Handling of Retire Prior To field
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3096>
> 
> * #3037: Require peers to check if RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID sequence number is valid
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3036>
> 
> * #3027: Codes for frame encoding errors
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3042>
> 
> * #2944: Layout of PreferredAddress
>   The proposal is to close with no action.
> 
> * #2928: Lift single-packet ClientHello requirement?
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3045>
> 
> * #2863: unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3121>
> 
> * #2823: Do Initial secrets change after Retry packet?
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2870>
> 
> * #2741: Re-visit initial keys discard
>   The proposal is to close with no action.
> 
> * #2152: Why does stateless reset have to be checked after MAC failure
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2993>
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/