Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, post-Cupertino

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 29 October 2019 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FA9120047 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=ctiNxJFp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=rBCktFuM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45sOcuHReCHb for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5A9E120046 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E973B218C1; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=h0VUAiivffAA1NwGwNrbwefOxAjm ATlTUeymLro6wsw=; b=ctiNxJFpLH/Tn36Y6Mn52IL3z7HEcwcATmCnCZXEjU4p UOz0jkufFS2jlfkqWDGVkXaRseOqUFDDlQSZHkeL1IKj3X/yQUFYQIib5iAsw4/7 wXbUZ+K+RJozH+JXdZ8BsA/DxetOKQM/BwjNRTTe11hXhvjCvDdqodICUFSQKpk3 c1gaCZqdHgbZbN9yI6ydGEFFMXT5rDcCs90LfabPRgWXO4Pb6CSu3wTz9wxSV6vk YOYt5rbKJ2tGG8gixlrZjMLLyheHGcX0R8/0iSpmBRYYnUCRiP4Zg6XqE7ZeOeGQ 01OSpMCQmYaPGxoKqZrno6kGCFxmwVOo0WAwC4OEuQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=h0VUAi ivffAA1NwGwNrbwefOxAjmATlTUeymLro6wsw=; b=rBCktFuMDAwBaIPYTcyS91 QnhN/4RyV3r4RSV/nYGbphyiA5CI3/u/6wocysWmCnhIM6OxMsaW4OswZG1JJwzp HtyX5oD5wFBA7dlsoGnzAZRiMzlg5S5Ed44x01sSiHgwaFXhNujip/joz6NCtQjg FW/O8X7MRsXhd5ZvntEwDbvQQpPurNoQp70B9KAUrIPe8QjAzyY6o9ohoFDonnxA rsqDGzJ3JX0TbAEShN6/5pym31Z01b5jT45VV/m6G6O6u5R4gxMp5NxzoknSnBSA 6c883zbmsjpPCy5tlA3nBmw/0lChXVv2k6pznBCg1xAQVS9gMgN+YNGIMHtZNqog ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:wbK3XWVDY3Ls5ZEx-aX7JfdHVWP6nrNXmDK1QXNoBHWuG1idNSRIwA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddttddgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:wbK3XXdHvhYr7lQaSRUwb802Fk3iSGOIPJQKJiUiguy3FPn_DYs3Fg> <xmx:wbK3XS-gOeqmI_AW1IYpGECbgSMaP5EqOvaJLlq5MfM8lmDI6zFzYg> <xmx:wbK3Xem8ysk7PS1uzmemcV-ZvHL5geGVotcmmBaJ9DGZCZTdDW1Szw> <xmx:wrK3XeNO_lGDgUlBZ2fPO6xWxAAR3B_5iexDbplpbD473V97G5jqZQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 802D6E00A1; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-512-g193a140-fmstable-20191028v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <98b890c7-d57f-484c-88d5-056e4e607465@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMdQPMeu862uizQYKr451Y9mvwhZ4MT7h_te5ho_Y9DOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D6397AF-B411-4E67-AFD2-76E8F2AD462C@mnot.net> <CANatvzwYA-NN+p5jLu4vpgKY_G-ZoUM03CacZWS2FAPyPqgiiw@mail.gmail.com> <BN3PR00MB0083E9A10A58F4CCC7B8A5C6B3680@BN3PR00MB0083.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <22517ab5-9a6c-4486-b7ea-03badc064cbe@www.fastmail.com> <CANatvzx=RWB1Bio7tqX7nN_Vn1SfSaE69LZbuiU5pWeXP=BwNQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB6PR10MB176678E88FF226C2EB8FF78EAC680@DB6PR10MB1766.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CACpbDccOe01VBjwwy=mdSi5nync8bXa506OMTbLPpBH-hoj4Sw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+4S06qHBbitdH07Ah6gJYV+ZMY4huYLVGw14Q-n6isCrg@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR2201MB17008576E4F8400B5DDB696FDA6B0@BN6PR2201MB1700.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CACpbDcf+n47NXh8XMEKx6n1fiJPZ+WyuivNmuBy1vKhZYZe6Uw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxQYyTQPpF13v0AT4R=TcFOa9=UCn0nWsiqwMReYFOYDYg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM2QGC+wx-UUKMkJDqxKscOgJfhqwPhr7QXg3h-GpZwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4d408d7a-7c50-4ccc-a42b-fb2b71b0c507@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBMdQPMeu862uizQYKr451Y9mvwhZ4MT7h_te5ho_Y9DOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:31:54 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: 'Eric Rescorla' <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, post-Cupertino
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/mAVGqFkw2sQo597ictLOeXHGhuQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:32:22 -0000

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, at 10:34, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 7:47 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019, at 10:01, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >  > I think we're clearly going to need to spend some time on this. I don't 
> >  > think the spec is satisfactory as-is: we should be designing a 
> >  > transport that works for all use cases, not just H3. That said, I also 
> >  > don't agree that we need an additional explicit signal. We have one, 
> >  > it's called "ACK". We should figure out how to make that work.
> > 
> >  I think that we've established that ACK doesn't work without something to push it along.
> 
> No, I don't agree with that assessment.

Well, I'd like some proof.  I shared what I believe to be proof earlier.  Happy to walk through it again though.