Re: [radext] please check draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-11 was Re: Issues with draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-09

Folks,

I take the silence as a sign of agreement. The document is good to
move forward on the IESG process.

- Jouni

On Feb 6, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Folks,
> 
> Everybody has already seen the proposal from Barry - thanks for it ;)
> 
> So lets make it official. Since we all have seen the changes and the
> discussion that lead to those, we should be OK with a one week review
> time. Every WG member is encouraged to verify the latest -11 version
> of the I-D whether the _changes_ are from -09. This is not a place for
> new material etc.
> 
> Express your OK/NOK/opinion by 13th Feb. If everything is fine, our
> AD can do the required steps regarding IESG telechat agenda and we
> are one step closer to publication.
> 
> - Jouni & Mauricio
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:49 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>>>> I'll go through the diffs between -09 and -11 now, while I wait for my
>>>> flight to HKG, and double-check that we're all set on the other
>>>> points.
>>> 
>>> Verified.  Please make any further changes that my last message moves
>>> you to, and then make sure the working group is OK with the changes.
>> 
>> FWIW, my suggestion:
>> 
>> 1. Alan posts a -12 version if he has further changes.
>> 2. Alan posts a message to the radext list, saying that he's made
>> quite a bunch of changes in response to IESG Evaluation, and the WG
>> should review them.  Include a URL for the diff between -09 and -12
>> (or -11).
>> 3. The chairs post a message to the radext list asking for any
>> objections to the changes to be posted by, say, 15 Feb.  The chairs
>> might specifically note that this is a call for review of the changes
>> only.
>> 4. Benoit sticks the document on the 21 Feb telechat agenda (and
>> remember to go back afterward and remove the "returning item" flag).
>> I suggest doing this now; no need to wait.
>> 5. When 15 Feb rolls around, Benoit changes the status back to "IESG
>> Evaluation".
>> 
>> Of course, this all assumes no significant objections from the WG, but
>> you all know how to deal with that if it happens.  :-)
>> 
>> Barry
>> _______________________________________________
>> radext mailing list
>> radext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
> 
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext