Re: [radext] Issues with draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-09

Thanks Barry,

I can see how the document improved thanks to your review.
See in line.
>>> I'll go through the diffs between -09 and -11 now, while I wait for my
>>> flight to HKG, and double-check that we're all set on the other
>>> points.
>> Verified.  Please make any further changes that my last message moves
>> you to, and then make sure the working group is OK with the changes.
> FWIW, my suggestion:
>
> 1. Alan posts a -12 version if he has further changes.
> 2. Alan posts a message to the radext list, saying that he's made
> quite a bunch of changes in response to IESG Evaluation, and the WG
> should review them.  Include a URL for the diff between -09 and -12
> (or -11).
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-09&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-11
> 3. The chairs post a message to the radext list asking for any
> objections to the changes to be posted by, say, 15 Feb.  The chairs
> might specifically note that this is a call for review of the changes
> only.
Chairs, please do so.
> 4. Benoit sticks the document on the 21 Feb telechat agenda (and
> remember to go back afterward and remove the "returning item" flag).
> I suggest doing this now; no need to wait.
Done.
> 5. When 15 Feb rolls around, Benoit changes the status back to "IESG
> Evaluation".
Will do.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Of course, this all assumes no significant objections from the WG, but
> you all know how to deal with that if it happens.  :-)
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
>
>