[radext] please check draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-11 was Re: Issues with draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-09

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E5D21F8507 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:42:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dO2Mc+GddcXI for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C37421F84E0 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:42:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gf7so1342673lbb.4 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:42:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=4QxDfwmA2Cudhx2lUPaDNJJu8NJhnOf3Rc8zxGRgH2E=; b=zYjM4RTOWs+5xMFy+k6rqfyJWPb/RTofohmYxhqiByz5f8SfyWqqXKsJBNMlN8De+a m2cDDj6jSf5z8Puyk0dF1265DanusQwiRDeaZdP+i+jvAX4hKp1IVuHg4EtpV1Ehybsl SwGIgYiSehARiYZI3rkLuYl+X23EC/CdncFL8iJCTt50OpDce0+eFsjpwmQ4pi3RuKIM QXj8WgqHZJc/sLmpyl3fCTnfpkXcaWDGF/EBG0q3PDmrNCK2T8F4dHl8MR0oKGaYRSmU MinrK0MwCBEG8XHCBTnqmuka/RxExSIcqKFormLlcPuRu4lcsyDcZkpohhz8pzhpughh Vejg==
X-Received: by 10.152.144.202 with SMTP id so10mr27480743lab.9.1360168941274; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:42:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.37.73.99] ([77.95.242.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v7sm3477740lbg.13.2013.02.06.08.42.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKmXFTErKykhCZTaa-M27zJgK9qqGxm07A4xAYicdHA8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:42:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <473C0020-09E7-40F8-A21E-D735C4CEA068@gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJLf91jdfOrqC4V-fcYK53uhc5UMxJDPzqf60b5cKqfGSA@mail.gmail.com> <510BE42B.1060102@deployingradius.com> <CALaySJ+1Vc4t6usTVeJM+pbBtxqEhb7GOCJmUz=M=zOr9JJNdw@mail.gmail.com> <510C6D0A.6020503@deployingradius.com> <CALaySJKPE47nrHXWxGtQcVjWedme=XQwrFeCOFshRwG9-HjvjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJK40wq6rw8RaK8G0Vj5dUM9mOYEYku5DnoL0NOvFHXXGA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKmXFTErKykhCZTaa-M27zJgK9qqGxm07A4xAYicdHA8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, radext-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [radext] please check draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-11 was Re: Issues with draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-09
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:42:25 -0000

Folks,

Everybody has already seen the proposal from Barry - thanks for it ;)

So lets make it official. Since we all have seen the changes and the
discussion that lead to those, we should be OK with a one week review
time. Every WG member is encouraged to verify the latest -11 version
of the I-D whether the _changes_ are from -09. This is not a place for
new material etc.

Express your OK/NOK/opinion by 13th Feb. If everything is fine, our
AD can do the required steps regarding IESG telechat agenda and we
are one step closer to publication.

- Jouni & Mauricio




On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:49 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

>>> I'll go through the diffs between -09 and -11 now, while I wait for my
>>> flight to HKG, and double-check that we're all set on the other
>>> points.
>> 
>> Verified.  Please make any further changes that my last message moves
>> you to, and then make sure the working group is OK with the changes.
> 
> FWIW, my suggestion:
> 
> 1. Alan posts a -12 version if he has further changes.
> 2. Alan posts a message to the radext list, saying that he's made
> quite a bunch of changes in response to IESG Evaluation, and the WG
> should review them.  Include a URL for the diff between -09 and -12
> (or -11).
> 3. The chairs post a message to the radext list asking for any
> objections to the changes to be posted by, say, 15 Feb.  The chairs
> might specifically note that this is a call for review of the changes
> only.
> 4. Benoit sticks the document on the 21 Feb telechat agenda (and
> remember to go back afterward and remove the "returning item" flag).
> I suggest doing this now; no need to wait.
> 5. When 15 Feb rolls around, Benoit changes the status back to "IESG
> Evaluation".
> 
> Of course, this all assumes no significant objections from the WG, but
> you all know how to deal with that if it happens.  :-)
> 
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext