Re: [radext] Issues with draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-09

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

>> I'll go through the diffs between -09 and -11 now, while I wait for my
>> flight to HKG, and double-check that we're all set on the other
>> points.
>
> Verified.  Please make any further changes that my last message moves
> you to, and then make sure the working group is OK with the changes.

FWIW, my suggestion:

1. Alan posts a -12 version if he has further changes.
2. Alan posts a message to the radext list, saying that he's made
quite a bunch of changes in response to IESG Evaluation, and the WG
should review them.  Include a URL for the diff between -09 and -12
(or -11).
3. The chairs post a message to the radext list asking for any
objections to the changes to be posted by, say, 15 Feb.  The chairs
might specifically note that this is a call for review of the changes
only.
4. Benoit sticks the document on the 21 Feb telechat agenda (and
remember to go back afterward and remove the "returning item" flag).
I suggest doing this now; no need to wait.
5. When 15 Feb rolls around, Benoit changes the status back to "IESG
Evaluation".

Of course, this all assumes no significant objections from the WG, but
you all know how to deal with that if it happens.  :-)

Barry