IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Sat, 26 July 2014 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD721B27D9 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRJF3bS4_ufw for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [88.190.25.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D7C1B27D6 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2994F2240267; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eo-tvUTO8Euq; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:03:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Thor.local (unknown [70.50.219.241]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B7DB224024E; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:03:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53D3A721.6050706@deployingradius.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:03:29 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.0.1406300368.3016.radext@ietf.org> <D1A82475-4CAA-49D8-A2E3-AC07F4879F15@freeradius.org> <53D2FB0A.1050002@gmail.com> <2254D673-36FF-4B64-AC0C-A7AC9CE4991A@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <2254D673-36FF-4B64-AC0C-A7AC9CE4991A@deployingradius.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/JTj6ZHxF6pRIGtF3pgFgrsFuSSc
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] draft-cheng-behave-cgn-cfg-radius-ext-07 feedback
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:04:08 -0000

Alan DeKok wrote:
>   Yes. I'll double check the document contents.  But the general idea was correct, I think. 

  I've checked the documents again.  The document
draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext uses good design for the TLVs, etc.

  My previous comments about IPFix still apply, though.  I think that
the ip-port document could leverage the IPFix document.  That way the
ip-port document would contain *no* new attribute definitions.  Instead,
it would explain how to use the RADIUS/IPFix attributes.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email