Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 20 April 2009 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4523A6EAE for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, WHOIS_NETSOLPR=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mWRpTj2mTix for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4744E3A69B7 for <rai@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,218,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="154924819"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2009 17:25:38 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n3KHPc4x029835; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:25:38 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.197]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3KHPbi5029277; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:25:37 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
References: <49A2B548.5090200@ericsson.com> <10bd01c99623$76c89b50$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <49E83A7D.90506@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:25:37 -0700
Message-ID: <077401c9c1dd$0577cbc0$c5f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <49E83A7D.90506@ericsson.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: Acm/OzWZfhCJLqN3TsyKG1kbRk257QCoczrw
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2516; t=1240248338; x=1241112338; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[RAI]=20Draft=20on=20P2P=20architecture s |Sender:=20; bh=dPBQ/p6+5q6XMplocQtUMGBast3/tg1ezGVH1hxo3NE=; b=GblSXGfQM8dn8t2G8b69pKOlYiONT8ZXOesDbmlQ0vwj6SARFOucB0Vz4n auJVQsjizynmA/ZBKykeOY1Cc1d+hYxf8YgmwNSa8n/uzM2REE2cOyCiTi5o 7EFfXy8ROr;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: rai@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:24:23 -0000

Thanks for incorporating those changes,
-d
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:15 AM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: rai@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> thanks for your comments. Answers inline:
> 
> Dan Wing wrote:
> >> the IAB has just submitted the following draft:
> >>
> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-p2p-archs-00.txt
> >>
> >> Comments are welcome.
> > 
> > Please add Gnutella, BitTorrent, and Skype to section 2.  I
> > noticed BitTorrent isn't mentioned in the document at all.
> 
> I have added BitTorrent to Section 2. However, I would not 
> like to have 
> too many examples in that section. Since Skype and Gnutella 
> were already 
> mentioned somewhere else in the document, I have not added new 
> subsections with them in Section 2.
> 
> > You might also mention Octoshape's 
> don't-look-under-the-covers P2P video
> > streaming application,
> > 
> http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/02/cnn-p2p-video-streamin
> g-tech-raises-qu
> > estions.ars
> > 
> 
> I have added references to Octoshape.
> 
> > 
> > end of Section 5.3,
> >      traditional SIP, which relays on a rendezvous server 
> infrastructure.
> >                             ^^^^^^
> >                             relies
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> > Section 6,
> >    we have discussed a number of
> >    perfectly legitimate applications that have been 
> implemented using
> >    P2P.
> > 
> > I would drop "perfectly" from that sentence.  (Same phrase 
> is in Section 1).
> > (Are there imperfectly legitimate applications?)
> 
> I would like to stress the fact that there are *fully* legitimate. If 
> you have a suggestion to give more emphasis to the sentence without 
> using "perfectly", let me know.
> 
> > To your list of legitimate uses of p2p technology in 
> Section 6, you might also
> > consider adding the "unofficial release" by Nine Inch Nails 
> of 400Gb of
> > time-synchronized multiple-camera HD video footage from 
> three concerts using
> > BitTorrent, http://forum.nin.com/bb/read.php?52,378166.  
> The trackers are on
> > nin.com's own website.
> 
> Since this is yet another example of content distribution using 
> bittorrent, I do not think we need to add it to the document... but 
> thanks for the reference anyway. It is interesting!
> 
> Thanks for your comments,
> 
> Gonzalo