Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 24 February 2009 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7218E3A657C for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:58:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.236, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, WHOIS_NETSOLPR=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vIzQBJc4Ep5Y for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987EC28C229 for <rai@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:58:42 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,256,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="146360778"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2009 01:59:01 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1O1x14i032455; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:59:01 -0800
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1O1x1xg011234; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:59:01 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, rai@ietf.org
References: <49A2B548.5090200@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:59:01 -0800
Message-ID: <10bd01c99623$76c89b50$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AcmVxkbCw8oL1L2gS0+JqxdKhsplNAAVYKbQ
In-Reply-To: <49A2B548.5090200@ericsson.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1241; t=1235440741; x=1236304741; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[RAI]=20Draft=20on=20P2P=20architecture s |Sender:=20; bh=SIhr77N6YLELfAArXOJ/kamZzqU2duzKTwD2Gm6erro=; b=NJpPz7qUSI7LXROHY+CMt6SxbQ0ZeRR16wMPZK1A4IfPqY08nEOz4I+2lD WhEP0NAP0gUfMv7SqEtm1muDgEDaZNYyrbl2ISqIZpEIjfCNvUxbAL4V/3wx W0+TMzoiES;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:58:49 -0000

> the IAB has just submitted the following draft:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-p2p-archs-00.txt
> 
> Comments are welcome.

Please add Gnutella, BitTorrent, and Skype to section 2.  I
noticed BitTorrent isn't mentioned in the document at all.
You might also mention Octoshape's don't-look-under-the-covers P2P video
streaming application,
http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/02/cnn-p2p-video-streaming-tech-raises-qu
estions.ars



end of Section 5.3,
     traditional SIP, which relays on a rendezvous server infrastructure.
                            ^^^^^^
                            relies


Section 6,
   we have discussed a number of
   perfectly legitimate applications that have been implemented using
   P2P.

I would drop "perfectly" from that sentence.  (Same phrase is in Section 1).
(Are there imperfectly legitimate applications?)


To your list of legitimate uses of p2p technology in Section 6, you might also
consider adding the "unofficial release" by Nine Inch Nails of 400Gb of
time-synchronized multiple-camera HD video footage from three concerts using
BitTorrent, http://forum.nin.com/bb/read.php?52,378166.  The trackers are on
nin.com's own website.

-d