Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 17 April 2009 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BF53A6D52 for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.692, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, WHOIS_NETSOLPR=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNZJkYuATg-z for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224443A6A42 for <rai@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 515FA23CB5; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:02:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-ac01fbb0000024d5-05-49e83ad1866e
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 530B822053; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:16:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:14:53 +0200
Received: from [131.160.37.44] ([131.160.37.44]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:14:53 +0200
Message-ID: <49E83A7D.90506@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:14:53 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
References: <49A2B548.5090200@ericsson.com> <10bd01c99623$76c89b50$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <10bd01c99623$76c89b50$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2009 08:14:53.0663 (UTC) FILETIME=[963E26F0:01C9BF34]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: rai@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RAI] Draft on P2P architectures
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:01:09 -0000

Hi Dan,

thanks for your comments. Answers inline:

Dan Wing wrote:
>> the IAB has just submitted the following draft:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-p2p-archs-00.txt
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Please add Gnutella, BitTorrent, and Skype to section 2.  I
> noticed BitTorrent isn't mentioned in the document at all.

I have added BitTorrent to Section 2. However, I would not like to have 
too many examples in that section. Since Skype and Gnutella were already 
mentioned somewhere else in the document, I have not added new 
subsections with them in Section 2.

> You might also mention Octoshape's don't-look-under-the-covers P2P video
> streaming application,
> http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/02/cnn-p2p-video-streaming-tech-raises-qu
> estions.ars
> 

I have added references to Octoshape.

> 
> end of Section 5.3,
>      traditional SIP, which relays on a rendezvous server infrastructure.
>                             ^^^^^^
>                             relies

Fixed.

> Section 6,
>    we have discussed a number of
>    perfectly legitimate applications that have been implemented using
>    P2P.
> 
> I would drop "perfectly" from that sentence.  (Same phrase is in Section 1).
> (Are there imperfectly legitimate applications?)

I would like to stress the fact that there are *fully* legitimate. If 
you have a suggestion to give more emphasis to the sentence without 
using "perfectly", let me know.

> To your list of legitimate uses of p2p technology in Section 6, you might also
> consider adding the "unofficial release" by Nine Inch Nails of 400Gb of
> time-synchronized multiple-camera HD video footage from three concerts using
> BitTorrent, http://forum.nin.com/bb/read.php?52,378166.  The trackers are on
> nin.com's own website.

Since this is yet another example of content distribution using 
bittorrent, I do not think we need to add it to the document... but 
thanks for the reference anyway. It is interesting!

Thanks for your comments,

Gonzalo