Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02

Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Mon, 21 May 2018 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <pm@dotandco.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83B912E880 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 May 2018 20:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dotandco.com header.b=Sd3kuaFK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=gXyn2zer
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oiftpar4Ry2s for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 May 2018 20:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5059612E882 for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 May 2018 20:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85B421625 for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 May 2018 23:19:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 May 2018 23:19:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dotandco.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=YCR8rM0mmhgQKVit+5uZaINChD8MI jEC6Y42f6A7Ik4=; b=Sd3kuaFKPQ/kjSVbdVfcWoCvJTBwWLA8yH6/4MXQt0fA9 6p0zyfuAv7HtR5XKeR3zM9ofWf3UM0Y51n6X8n41fuIw30uW7aeqt7rmqL264ChC sXhfV9wy0trWipOggOnQFrR47P9ILae7+7/UfG5oyU7rrPLpE03pdBkBITm4ZaTW ipooPE7R90e9kn+tkuJAaMWP6UsRvo8Uyjs6jBKCsBzM2ACYVeFonZr7fvdWW42L mYZDVDfulJ574i8ors0cp6yap4QPgdWe+wiK0YPscyYUqkgpSSclijQmONasHIlz ygY62/gja2xdkxBXM0TwmP2IFYAg0A5Ay/o5qmTGw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=YCR8rM 0mmhgQKVit+5uZaINChD8MIjEC6Y42f6A7Ik4=; b=gXyn2zerwHV8tpu2J+erNX YlxmkmzwDl0HqDqyR2Zeb5azhgYkad9ZeK9SnwrDt6M39UlvmPwjxY/h/WSmzjBX uyVrKyUwOQRBOwkN+Pf64C04NA9EAz1UdWYJYpFSXsLdVDaGfS3zbrOp+MWG4gfN PjvYYmXw9Y109m2heNngXXAHLlvc8/vwHp+2CjVIGCiavgzOKf9uNOeYvsyqtSLo O2G7tjK+/58JYlXIgYi9c+6wNSlZtSFHFaD+EXBKtLXFRD/5/MutSKWEA2chkfvS J8ubkVOgC/69hyeRbJL8XtyLM+Awab2IE+zgCCz9Kr36cv68k/IbQLqM0eEv7CIQ ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pDoCW-5zk5OrfVZIUb3Kf9uK9368krMHgzDFeAbnFQhtN1NbnZQKPQ>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pDoCW8L8f2WVlR2k1IqG2ic373gb45kBcV_b2cxeYs_DkK5w4ihs2g>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pDoCW6aiVH15bu5yQLoJ0svsDpRk0fvkGFONjpBY3c7G2vupaRKAiw>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pDoCW53lwS9b-BXoalI2ct99Pua5gZBqrD04YWfRR125DhniAQjz3g>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pDoCW8McdGfFXaNB6igQOA9fUiEAzA9p1I_kmGyItViwx0cy9a-n7w>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pDoCWwTWb8oljvr41gNfxDyYJ70N-c4rvzxkZWcQ3wVbuQbHrIMLfA>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pDoCWy0qSzJuTQ09ZNrBAcJ53PFZSEfisAuzfCYQnnDoPHoOwlV03xrhke0>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 42C449E0BD; Sun, 20 May 2018 23:19:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1526872740.790268.1378875200.662ECDF2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-a224ff37
In-Reply-To: <656C123C-9ECF-434D-948D-4E704ED3E75C@elistx.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 05:19:00 +0200
References: <80ED56C6-75F7-4DED-927B-E0AB528A71EE@elistx.com> <656C123C-9ECF-434D-948D-4E704ED3E75C@elistx.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/xpfph-1QpcvUyKKqBfUw4xuoA_M>
Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-org-02
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 03:19:09 -0000

On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 15:32, James Galvin wrote:
> With that, version 06 of this document has been published and the chairs 
> are declaring WGLC closed.  The document is now ready for submission to 
> IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard.

Isn't that a little rushed?

>From a quick search I have found about only 2 explicit mention of support of this document, from Pieter and Scott (as for myself I can not say I explicitely support it because I am still uneasy by the need for it or not seeing it and still not understanding some part of it like all the "role" part).

Also the document went into so many iterations during the period that it was basicaly impossible to follow
(one night I have tried reviewing its newest version by implementing it in my client... to find out in the morning that a new version went out so I kind of decided to stop giving it my time before it stabilizes in some way); some new comments even just popped out on the mailing-list yesterday.

So I feel uneasy process-wise. Based on the amount of iterations during WGLC it looks like to me that there is at least still some work needed on it, and I am not sure its current version correspond really to the working group consensus.

The above applies the same way for the two "organization" documents.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek