RE: [Widex] Widex Servers...

Yes, but in most of those scenarios you are not accessing the servers
directly but through some kind of VPN, making the Widex Renderer part of
the same network as the Widex Server, case which is already described in
the document.

Vlad

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Chaz Ginger [mailto:eprparadocs@gmail.com] 
>Sent: 07 February, 2006 16:03
>To: Stirbu Vlad (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
>Cc: widex@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Widex] Widex Servers...
>
>Vlad,
>
> Why wouldn't you include the case of the Widex server behind 
>a firewall? I would expect that to be the most common case.  
>Most companies that I know and work for all use some sort of 
>firewall. Am I missing something?
>
>Chuck
>
>Vlad.Stirbu@nokia.com wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: widex-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:widex-bounces@ietf.org] On 
>>> Behalf Of ext Chaz Ginger
>>> Sent: 06 February, 2006 17:12
>>> To: Dean Willis
>>> Cc: widex@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [Widex] Widex Servers...
>>>
>>> >From looking at the requirement docs I noticed that there
>>> isn't a model
>>> for a Widex Server behind a NAT.  Why?
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> We haven't considered the case when the Widex Server to be behind a 
>> NAT device to be very common. For this reason it was not included in 
>> the scope of this document.
>>
>>   
>>> Also why the model where both the server and the renderer 
>are behind 
>>> the NAT? Is this specifically to address the notion of localized 
>>> discovery?
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Yes, this scenario is specifically related to localized discovery.
>>
>> Vlad
>>
>>
>>   
>
>

_______________________________________________
Widex mailing list
Widex@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex