RE: [Widex] Widex Servers...

It seems that I misunderstood your previous example... I thought that
you were talking about Widex servers in corporate networks. So, for
service providers like Google or Yahoo, the server front-end has a
globally routable, public IP address (and/or FQDN), similar to section
4.1.2.

Vlad 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Chaz Ginger [mailto:eprparadocs@gmail.com] 
>Sent: 07 February, 2006 16:40
>To: Stirbu Vlad (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
>Cc: widex@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Widex] Widex Servers...
>
>Vlad,
>
> Perhaps you can explain to me how someone like Google, MSN or 
>Yahoo would offer Widex based services? Are you thinking they 
>would use a VPN?
>
>Chuck
>
>Vlad.Stirbu@nokia.com wrote:
>> Yes, but in most of those scenarios you are not accessing 
>the servers 
>> directly but through some kind of VPN, making the Widex 
>Renderer part 
>> of the same network as the Widex Server, case which is already 
>> described in the document.
>>
>> Vlad
>>
>>   
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ext Chaz Ginger [mailto:eprparadocs@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 07 February, 2006 16:03
>>> To: Stirbu Vlad (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
>>> Cc: widex@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Widex] Widex Servers...
>>>
>>> Vlad,
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't you include the case of the Widex server behind a 
>>> firewall? I would expect that to be the most common case.
>>> Most companies that I know and work for all use some sort of 
>>> firewall. Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>> Vlad.Stirbu@nokia.com wrote:
>>>     
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: widex-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:widex-bounces@ietf.org] On 
>>>>> Behalf Of ext Chaz Ginger
>>>>> Sent: 06 February, 2006 17:12
>>>>> To: Dean Willis
>>>>> Cc: widex@ietf.org
>>>>> Subject: [Widex] Widex Servers...
>>>>>
>>>>> >From looking at the requirement docs I noticed that there
>>>>> isn't a model
>>>>> for a Widex Server behind a NAT.  Why?
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>> We haven't considered the case when the Widex Server to be 
>behind a 
>>>> NAT device to be very common. For this reason it was not 
>included in 
>>>> the scope of this document.
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>> Also why the model where both the server and the renderer
>>>>>         
>>> are behind
>>>     
>>>>> the NAT? Is this specifically to address the notion of localized 
>>>>> discovery?
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>> Yes, this scenario is specifically related to localized discovery.
>>>>
>>>> Vlad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>     
>>
>>
>>   
>
>

_______________________________________________
Widex mailing list
Widex@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex