RE: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Requirements:draft-ietf-widex-requirements-01.txt

Hi Vlad,

My comments are based on reading both the January framework draft and the
April requirement draft. So I agree with you that the comments might be a
bit too detailed for the requirements draft, and indeed they may be more
appropriate for the framework draft.

Regards,

Jin
________________________________________
Jin Yu
OpenXUP.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vlad.Stirbu@nokia.com [mailto:Vlad.Stirbu@nokia.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:46 AM
> To: jyu@openxup.org; widex@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for
> Requirements:draft-ietf-widex-requirements-01.txt
> 
> Hi Jin,
> 
> We started the requirements draft with the goal of having a minimal set
> of requirements that a system exporting the UI to another system must
> fulfill but stop short of going deeper in describing the system. Having
> these goals in mind we described the high level interactions between the
> Widex Server and Widex Renderer as having just two basic interfaces:
> 
> a) update interface, used to send information from the server to the
> renderer that is basically generated by the application logic;
> b) event interface, used to send information from the renderer to the
> server that is basically generated by the user interaction with the
> rendered UI.
> 
> It is quite likely that the terms used so far in the requirements draft
> will not map directly to the specification, as is the case with the
> proposed Widex framework
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stirbu-widex-framework-00.txt
> ) where practically all messages exchanged between the Widex Server and
> the Widex Renderer are events described using REX.
> 
> I think that being able to dynamically adjust which events server is
> interested in is a good feature but that is a design issue and Dave
> already mentioned several alternatives. We'll have to asses these
> alternatives and select the optimal one for our environment.
> 
> As a bottom line, I think that your comments are very useful but I think
> that they should be considered for the Widex Framework draft rather than
> for the Requirements.
> 
> Regards,
> Vlad

_______________________________________________
Widex mailing list
Widex@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex