Re: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Requirements: draft-ietf-widex-requirements-01.txt
Rosfran Lins Borges <rosfran.borges@indt.org.br> Sun, 30 April 2006 03:26 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fa2ZU-0005iy-KP; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:26:08 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fa2ZT-0005it-Oy for widex@ietf.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:26:07 -0400
Received: from mgw-ext14.nokia.com ([131.228.20.173]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fa2ZQ-0000bM-10 for widex@ietf.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:26:07 -0400
Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143]) by mgw-ext14.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k3U3Q2gi028630 for <widex@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:26:02 +0300
Received: from daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.111]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:25:49 +0300
Received: from daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.115]) by daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:25:48 -0500
Received: from [172.19.141.58] ([172.19.141.58]) by daebe102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:25:47 -0500
Message-ID: <44542C47.2010906@indt.org.br>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:17:27 -0300
From: Rosfran Lins Borges <rosfran.borges@indt.org.br>
Organization: INdT/Recife
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: widex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Requirements: draft-ietf-widex-requirements-01.txt
References: <720C0F5E-1E21-4BB6-B59A-2BC98311340E@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <720C0F5E-1E21-4BB6-B59A-2BC98311340E@softarmor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2006 03:25:47.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[C5A48E50:01C66C05]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
X-BeenThere: widex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the WIDEX working group at IETF <widex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex>, <mailto:widex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/widex>
List-Post: <mailto:widex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:widex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex>, <mailto:widex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: widex-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, I want to be a volunteer on writing this review to the IETF Widex draft. I have been following all the Widex document releases, since the time it had been started (I had studied the later LRDP draft too, another standard released by Vlad Stirbu last year on IETF), and did read some another RUI architectures. So, it will be a pleasure to contribute to this standard! Thanks, Rosfran Borges ext Dean Willis wrote: > I'd like to request that the WIDEX working group commence last call > on our requirements draft: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-widex-requirements-01.txt > > Please copy all comments to the list and to the authors directly. > > I'd like to conclude WGLC by May 15, 2006. > > So what does this mean? Since it's our first WGLC, let's talk about it: > > First, everybody participating in the working group needs to read the > draft carefully, even if they don't care much about the topic. > > Do we agree with the requirements listed? Are there any requirements > that we know of that aren't listed? Is the text clear, concise, and > well-worded? Is everything spelled right? Are the right documents > referenced? Are all the referenced documents needed? > > Note: IDNITS says: > > - Unused Reference: [RFC4213] is defined on line 511, but not > referenced > ' [RFC4213] Nordmark, E. and R. Gilligan, "Basic Transition > Mechanisms' > > so it's possible that not all the referenced documents are needed, or > vice-versa. > > > One of the tricky parts with lightly-attended working groups is > making sure that review has been sufficient. Would anyone (who is not > an author of this draft) be willing to write up a review of the > draft? Please volunteer . . . It would be even better to have two > designated reviewers. > > Thanks, > > -- > Dean Willis > chair, WIDEX > > > _______________________________________________ > Widex mailing list > Widex@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex -- Rosfran Lins Borges Engenheiro de Software Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT/Recife _______________________________________________ Widex mailing list Widex@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/widex
- [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Requir… Dean Willis
- Re: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Re… Rosfran Lins Borges
- Re: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Re… Jin Yu
- Re: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Re… Dave Raggett
- RE: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Re… Jin Yu
- RE: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Re… Vlad.Stirbu
- RE: [Widex] Working group last call (WGLC) for Re… Jin Yu