IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] What do do about SVG

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 16 December 2020 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03543A0989; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qRbUTmwtze_I; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 573C33A0982; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8088BF4074D; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B016F4074D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAHv0E6P64KG for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0B1F4074C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:07:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1608116869; bh=j2KgiTTfRCdyXPMM+W6iZ3+PHk1w6Mh3PBVJ09by0w8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cSmHHXpdv8/W3Hr2NCnZLQYjHDfF/fKJUjoIxeF+aEHAKN/jzVMmpRSmpfZlELFyh fRlBejUhtMsD4lqyzLCiV5PGzS578QAIHDoG3kSsaVUX9bCC4U3oAqeXRagv7Bww9I JuROSb1e4H7ekqZylsXX5rlSR4geIeJY0xfsAyKo=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mf07E-1kA7Ad2Cd8-00gVOw for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:07:49 +0100
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <f564019-d8b1-76c2-2768-c135d834dc32@iecc.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <d25f887c-0ffc-42f5-768b-86ae49315667@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:07:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f564019-d8b1-76c2-2768-c135d834dc32@iecc.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/grCvPnJi3deWTHjcw8XkRH6C+WUFvi8iFzbcJJmIG2bQwMN33H pAdGDhi4Lr4Z+L+kqSj7vZ+Rwo1qtezChLUbVVoemqcDrSwGT6yE78ytp0ukxDGnI4qUUT4 rRsf5w3TqicHMbkcb72khps59qKIoQdBY8594FCfkxax2QkwGcfr4H3u5x/NQbruDsIMhCN ogRzIDy7G5IvzjJvte5Uw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:LgooBCk4Kdo=:9kz+n9WPX77gULhY2cyKfg 6o1CypUFPBhsaoqYTi5s78g9Gqn89RTNUA64h18j1n6EgCfmtTernw+v9Jkl1G3ZYHOM/DTcd Y+6qZK4MAeb0ZUAVl7zgyzEMDBdKdOpXQv0+9qF+DYEMjlGFni4UBKu9Kjiua4vli4R3z6WU7 itTWh8uVquWjFJP9xtfiBUIKd1VOhCSg0CDnZN8+caJKSw/yI4Q5C2JqJ0Lv05XNfHmB45b6g s1/sAGs4rnZzCmp/kq59nSVZ3Nzy9KIMkcDcn3S7vjfDNwnnWgGmXGO44YzqD/jKuCVi+YBSw VFz1RZNbxkcQtzCZVDA3WDOBMmz85EnjWeZfdR4mie/OtfxgQqGL5stDGaxQp/yUmBiOAVeAz MvDGCsRuhmqCXhj4AHHsHKdFXDHR9WtlhojJzJIeYd79eVLIqVntlrByDnOA9MmYFKpdNN3Ft I6mtRkIZFJBVV5TH3Oub7F1PPxcRllUIcu/5pWiE7RU7crsSVzfNIQOMNSQFDSp9U9c4eL8kj VSR/ZC9vohjC2Stu5ahSJu21uuN+QThc3EpnT3Fp4ee1H/jmaDO6hEm3IHCFROSxsU6pxgMJS tFxDbpHu+NIMyOVDJsY5dOfA7+V2Uxr4ahqBs+dbgJ7ie8vSokD1cZLWA8HJOg04Oscfcg6Ur GtSg+d2coV9JkspJzCgTjDxd0Idmx9vlbIjJ+r7DirmjSuVInJ5KpWuwdprXY1aXmJ/CVcADP 4bvVQrZKY3JXxPNGnNWEUwOU6Okq9/O8IP4lONdpDuXdYOmpu4EEDuFc5SzJK9chFB1SHsu1M wVXhaM+72Hzmuwsv2e8RwZIDoBjIbKeU5+b6Vfvn7JrNNfh18BC3BGx2WR0+/gmg41oVLT7na DSfJMs3RJMgefuG5sqbQ==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] What do do about SVG
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 15.12.2020 um 20:47 schrieb John R. Levine:
>> I'd like to see some constructive discussion of how to fix the SVG
>> problem. Of course, that would need to start with an analysis of
>> what the problem is, beyond that fact that generating diagrams that
>> respect the current rules is a major pain.
>
> Yeah, that's on the list.  Not being much of an SVG user I gather that
> we backed the wrong horse and picked an SVG profile that nobody else uses.
>
> Assuming that one of the goals is to have good tool support, what SVG
> tools do people use and what profiles do they support?
> ...

I have tried to use Graphviz' SVG output, also KGT railroad diagrams.

In both cases, even after using a tool to strip colors etc (see
<https://github.com/reschke/xml2rfc/blob/master/prep-xml2rfc.xslt>), the
lack of markers made things really hard.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email