Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 30 October 2020 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E163A0B0A; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHdovO0J3Q3F; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB663A0B08; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D88F4071E; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F3CF4071E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0Du7BIuRK87 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7808F4071D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D9E389D9; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:59:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gWq-QBsv6I4M; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:59:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE9C389D3; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:59:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E5659A; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <30D23CA0-2A80-4BA3-AC18-285CF45FB5FF@mnot.net>
References: <30D23CA0-2A80-4BA3-AC18-285CF45FB5FF@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:52:49 -0400
Message-ID: <13255.1604019169@localhost>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1761386887937039526=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
    > When editing a source document (especially Markdown), many people seem
    > to find it best to NOT line-wrap paragraphs, so that diffs (e.g., on
    > GitHub) are minimal; otherwise re-wrapping causes a lot of noise in
    > diffs during the WG process.

Yup.
I like once line per sentence though.
I used to make my XML and my markdown all pretty, but I stopped once I taught
my editor to make it pretty as I type.

    > When an XML document goes to the RFC Editor, it will be line-wrapped
    > (apparently manually). This causes difficulties in creating an XML diff
    > from the source document to the one that's being offered for approval
    > -- something that I feel is necessary, given that XML is now the
    > canonical format.

When you say that they get wrapped, does it just the wrap long lines to
multiple lines, or does it put lines together which are in different
sentences? To take the above paragraph, do we get:

    > When an XML document goes to the RFC Editor, it will be line-wrapped
    > (apparently manually). This causes difficulties in creating an XML diff
    > from the source document to the one that's being offered for approval
    > -- something that I feel is necessary, given that XML is now the
    > canonical format.

or:

    > When an XML document goes to the RFC Editor, it will be line-wrapped
    > (apparently manually).
    > This causes difficulties in creating an XML diff from the source
    > document to the one that's being offered for approval -- something that
    > I feel is necessary, given that XML is now the canonical format.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest