IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 01 November 2020 05:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306F03A0A65; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=juYc7o1n; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VdGh7tAb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X_Yqg3sbTkjp; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C7083A093D; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F17F40709; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABCAF40709 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=juYc7o1n; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VdGh7tAb
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RmdwIhqXzfbJ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66902F40704 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 22:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105085C0101; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Nov 2020 01:23:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=V r521ak4nxf1W0CMHSGDQrYwQGc70kcoWkqxiH5UgQ4=; b=juYc7o1nrFle8Ay6Y u1TL32Q2oZGFlvD0lOe8KeZsgwdbxxP6I4mYJPtkTyPi3AFIS/+1mH2ZXxuD5nTe OsqKnnZqSoC42iLkvOlNsJQu7NOfrPsIjhi5MNcYe/IyCbOilY+35FgTl8bry68w v6bXMcL4cobLKqamoJaMD2qtPtASE4xD89mEna4fxuf6cCdk/YD4HzvrBiYHhtMI c1OOIJYFU1A0tidG2m9Kt2KrXf2vO8kPfq8TcMkFOPt+B0wPlTkuL+XEujHvbEuS B57NgfKlmA965LuGI4MpF0lf1WCQ5U4ZYxiyggK/8Yz8UZ4XZyoaRZ9tOJTiO/76 0CekQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Vr521ak4nxf1W0CMHSGDQrYwQGc70kcoWkqxiH5Ug Q4=; b=VdGh7tAbU8vwfepndnx5z+vlM7UJLW8QO5a6fxaTDabOG087x4/3r1Mb+ fK+Ysib+xexrKgtwo1+fP/wumC/t0XfBT1FTVZeStcpOUQakIey2EvuV0E+xs//1 j1+69lWCGedQmPh8pgbBqIHTO/BONkxaXSJIrSpbyl3YpqDE4kkAw4EG13VoxWZ+ G5wRHesj+4kdNLWwQ8mpsoTXFB64nby3bONUHw0HOyQ3hDKXJg//BDwMnS/NCdpv ioqKRlMjnysxMEVXJpNvIpncvasnq+oGjOiaTjisaxMvg3IMg/6glJu08sw26LQQ GrVT5XsNxwioch6rzGWJadeBuBw+g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:N0aeX02vVF2px4llQWXYLS62RRzOuxV10IZ5KQo7B67I9iB0dq0q0Q> <xme:N0aeX_Htf3v6DZMr94KFJmyXGoHQR7s4s49453CmC1UW1oQy4Nb67ODx0ViJbyc4n ER0_bChMMpM6tLABQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrleekgdekvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepteefleffjeffhfehheeffeegudelgfeujedukeeigedvgeehffefvdehffeileek necuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddvhe dunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhn ohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:N0aeX84ty9RJRk3QWkVGpGAHVhcVml1J-WtHL5kecyQAYKZfPCQ5Cw> <xmx:N0aeX90AdUiZn65gl002sp98PKYvS80oJydw3PwGnAIFQNQiHIEXKQ> <xmx:N0aeX3Gwl6YRv0lvvaImosdX6iQrUCEmSDgEB9hffXn1edsfIVzIWw> <xmx:OEaeX_Dm7E9471Y-lQv8eO_bqB3qbPuqEgnF4uMLBKcqW5Q-nuaRLg>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 300C23064674; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:23:01 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <B7180DCF-99F9-4E2D-B5A8-B61A743E2505@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 16:22:58 +1100
Message-Id: <CCC1FCFC-C40A-4751-A196-224C24E2E6DE@mnot.net>
References: <ac2a7cfd-d51c-5803-21dc-4fefa5ecf235@nthpermutation.com> <F75DF553-AD3E-47E1-AD95-319D28806A11@fugue.com> <4489975b-1e7c-e869-217e-9ebae3651056@nthpermutation.com> <086c01d6aead$ca98e000$5fcaa000$@olddog.co.uk> <8024C105-0E02-43A5-A27C-6A6A397E2C62@mnot.net> <849CF568-BCAC-4A25-8AB9-104F99F11935@tzi.org> <5857A5A1-5334-43AA-80B7-8C448FD79274@mnot.net> <B7180DCF-99F9-4E2D-B5A8-B61A743E2505@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On 1 Nov 2020, at 4:21 pm, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> What I was trying to say was that the comparison operation (and that only) should involve normalization of both inputs to be compared.  You don’t use the normalization outputs for anything else.

I understand. I'm just uncomfortable comparing to anything other than what actually is being approved.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email