IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] RFC Editor liaison to the IAB? [was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-12]

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sat, 12 March 2022 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8F93A0D84; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:59:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k9wI7rDsnPZg; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7023A0D87; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:59:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1nSr27-000J7c-WD; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:59:04 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:58:57 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
cc: rfced-future@iab.org, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1350B8E6AB2C7ECF5AF881B2@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <b17d4b9d-9456-41a7-0a62-45d35d2fbb07@gmail.com>
References: <BY5PR11MB41963ABAE51BC46E205087BDB50B9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <134294e0-5bd5-9b22-2d95-f6032e67f516@stpeter.im> <7D016D6C-ACCE-4431-BC83-905ECB885B5F@kuehlewind.net> <bf702de8-a876-3d9f-23d8-4ba49f86bd05@gmail.com> <E8C97678-AD00-402B-9646-DEFF6E76263D@ietf.org> <d4ac965c-65b1-e909-864c-cb14e27a3b0f@stpeter.im> <040d9aac-04be-2bef-fad4-b41f2af271e9@gmail.com> <B87EBCF2-16FB-4A22-86FF-20603200E749@ietf.org> <e012452a-61d1-f499-f19e-6d3ff9863901@gmail.com> <4AD933FC-4032-4A10-92DD-A34ADEDD557F@eggert.org> <CANMZLAZmrdxQuGT=W36gUf3gEd3d1C_0c-hfdO2-gpFUOQf7sg@mail.gmail.com> <AB5E3E46-D450-4E21-B67B-D639F67734AE@eggert.org> <8b51b14e-7342-7336-2d3a-e163bf640c89@gmail.com> <066b58ac-ad6c-e5f0-5260-1b9e0267f198@stpeter.im> <242ecf9f-f7c7-7ff6-4199-ad8875b7ac6d@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <b17d4b9d-9456-41a7-0a62-45d35d2fbb07@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/EIlrYJdImDVPm8wxFsV5nawTnmk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:00:39 -0800
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] RFC Editor liaison to the IAB? [was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-12]
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 01:59:14 -0000


--On Saturday, March 12, 2022 13:40 +1300 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12-Mar-22 13:21, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>> On 2022-03-12 05:40, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> +1 to removing the liaison (no one seems to think it's
>>> needed) and +1 to the proposed text.
>> 
>> +1 from me, too. I'm also okay if John Klensin's text gets
>> included, but I don't really think that text is necessary.
>> The IAB can talk to anybody they like at any time anyway.
> 
> Another point is that the rfcefdp program would be stepping
> outside its
> role to propose a generic change to the IAB charter. I'd
> expect that sort
> of change to be proposed by the IAB itself.

And I would like to hear from the IAB, or IAB members on this
subject.   If I am the only one who would like to leave that
door open, so be it.  If making the change that way seems
reasonable and noting that this is the first time the charter
document has been modified in more than 21 years in spite of far
greater changes to the IAB than the liaison list, why not put it
here and avoid extra work.  But the decision should definitely
be in the IAB's hands.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email