Re: [Rfced-future] RFC Editor liaison to the IAB? [was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-12]

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 10 March 2022 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B333A0E1D; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:14:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rO3-88xhmvfj; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC2D3A1C13; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:a554:7080:603c:d8ab]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C90A1D5434; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 23:13:58 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1646946838; bh=REUgs9t9zIYfjp43ajFb82pL16B+j85rLzALaYu7zak=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=PH++bh8zVxXfd0klwk7wo70RCtr75bpm3p21K632mrorShsd7yz/9U5zuBD7PUnTz ocuZF/Gk+5e6We7sF92Kco8AE9GlVX9SedJ65QCuqTiuc/Ds06d1axVJRwFK/RMqeC UfzzGOxgDLbQ4bC9k0kgYBv0B7ti5oc2OFLB8DAY=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_247ABE37-BDB0-40ED-B200-8EA0E520CE79"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <7D016D6C-ACCE-4431-BC83-905ECB885B5F@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 23:13:56 +0200
Cc: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-Id: <702330E0-0D47-47AD-8434-C6F1EF6CA40F@eggert.org>
References: <BY5PR11MB41963ABAE51BC46E205087BDB50B9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <134294e0-5bd5-9b22-2d95-f6032e67f516@stpeter.im> <7D016D6C-ACCE-4431-BC83-905ECB885B5F@kuehlewind.net>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-MailScanner-ID: 6C90A1D5434.A5A44
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/UfSd6v7np3MO2181aLpr5WkppJQ>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] RFC Editor liaison to the IAB? [was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-12]
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:14:11 -0000

Hi,

On 2022-3-10, at 22:57, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> It seems like this is actually something we might also want to update as well in draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter. Brian? Lars?

I agree that any changes, if the community or the IAB desires them, should be added to draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter. This would probably entail another IETF LC, but so be it.

Thanks,
Lars