Re: [Rfced-future] RFC Editor liaison to the IAB? [was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-12]

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

+1 to removing the liaison (no one seems to think it's needed) and +1 to 
the proposed text.

On 3/11/22 1:08 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> *If* there is consensus to remove the liaison, here is is my proposed
> update to draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter.
> 
> OLD:
> Note that RFC 2850 states that the RFC Editor appoints a liaison member
> to the IAB. This does not change, but refers to the RFC Editor function
> as described in {{I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model}}.
> 
> NEW:
> RFC 2850 states that the RFC Editor appoints a liaison member
> to the IAB. This is no longer necessary.
> 
> ADD to the "Changed text" section:
> In section 1.2 of RFC 2850, entitled "Ex-Officio and Liaison members"
> the phrase "the RFC Editor," is deleted.
> 
> Regards
>     Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 11-Mar-22 22:34, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2022-3-11, at 11:29, Brian Carpenter <[e-mail]> 
>> wrote:
>>> I have no problem if there's consensus to remove the liaison,
>>
>> I think it would be good if others in the program spoke up on this, so 
>> the chairs can take consensus.
>>
>>> but will that need another last call? Awaiting instructions...
>>
>> I think - but would not mind to be convinced otherwise - that change 
>> would better be last-called. I can't recall of the top of my head 
>> whether a two-week repeated last call would be possible, or if it 
>> needs to be four weeks again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lars
>>