Re: [Rfced-future] Issue 143: RSAB mailing list archives

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 11 January 2022 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B183A1B7F for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 23:10:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFAQ8gYQsd1y for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 23:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1C33A1B7E for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 23:10:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:f816:6939:f497:7016]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EC4E1D2568; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:10:06 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1641885006; bh=uUOjiJ7L+CmUNyoabsENL4lVouJBMonDe4YMknJDz8w=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=0uChw4BLpkeW60fF6aZKn1C2LsL8C/ncLZCSz34PMxQX94/o5sX//7OooJS2K3mIe wzu57dO5BIN7S8j1U5RjnIAV82yEYAUtErDyOOL2OHaE2DQvA9hiCv5e61PE7uqh8p /535e68d+H8P+miY2H4436uQAbm3VEy6u8XQp2sA=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DA52AC66-13C6-4F21-9A58-452BED2ADB2D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANk3-NAVzQ3MGd21mBTTW31DZPtipDa6xyE4LLhUdxi1fT60sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:10:03 +0200
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-Id: <88E57876-7139-46C7-A150-4A52319F2014@eggert.org>
References: <3e1fe494-c86b-5181-6afb-128b05fec882@stpeter.im> <48043fa8-eb37-2f97-942c-500492664bb0@gmail.com> <e708572f-b678-f60c-ab84-c48e039926a7@stpeter.im> <95dd0e5a-c5f4-09d1-98b4-327978e21316@gmail.com> <1846FA24-9631-4622-9EE6-B0D4A2B505C3@kuehlewind.net> <CANk3-NCkDCqz2m5X0aLGXKYttZ3U8LK-YppsyHYK6TT0RDYgHw@mail.gmail.com> <8a648870-03ec-b4c2-426b-357022e94c05@cs.tcd.ie> <548366C9-4581-4D4F-8638-7A5F7B754D13@eggert.org> <CANk3-NA1+-46Q0QkV_cr7SNB_nKU3+vEqqK7dMtwmf12Efyaog@mail.gmail.com> <203C6967-5A21-4100-8A5A-EB64E67B33EC@eggert.org> <CANk3-NAVzQ3MGd21mBTTW31DZPtipDa6xyE4LLhUdxi1fT60sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu>
X-MailScanner-ID: 2EC4E1D2568.A7B0E
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/dXZS9vXH2_e8k-ww8xwHTAf8xiM>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Issue 143: RSAB mailing list archives
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:10:25 -0000

Hi,

On 2022-1-11, at 4:38, Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu> wrote:
> Reasons people in this group want a mailing list archive so far:
> * transparency
> * being able to reference past discussions
> * NEW to answer "Would these discussions not happen in the RSWG anyway?": because it makes the RSAB begins to look like a black box where decisions are made and minutes report high level summaries without the detailed discussions that actually took place.

so maybe my understanding about the new model is off, but: I have understood the proposed structure to be such that the RSAB really doesn't have a lot of leeway when it comes to not approving proposals by the RSWG, especially not without immediately needing to take the discussion back to the RSWG in such cases. In other words, I'm struggling to come up with examples where significant discussions would happen inside the RSAB only.

> * It matches how the IETF operates (with a counter argument of "this isn't an IETF WG")

IMO, it doesn't. The RSWG is supposed to mirror how an IETF WG works, but not the RSAB, which is much more IESG- or IAB-like.

Thanks,
Lars

> Reasons against:
> * free-conversations are easier where people don't have to worry about being quoted/attributed
> * it sets a precedence (though counter arguments have essentially asked "for who?")
> 
> I'm sure I missed something.
> --
> Rfced-future mailing list
> Rfced-future@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future