IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Issue 143: RSAB mailing list archives

Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu> Tue, 11 January 2022 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <hardaker@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9653A100D for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:39:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=isi.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Odj4zOefRUbP for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DEE3A100F for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id p37so27196627uae.8 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:39:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isi.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7jSeeMaH8rjYA2gChz97M1oYZJPZlQwSAtAkiVQtnY8=; b=UwPEQI6ZS8DhKVDspJWdjJ1tEJ+kL3RfYa3gnS0JJrJQBnbMElMCBatolzL41aXnwK WNOX7UDoDvN4fALdVXoaSN9TSE7MN29Z4/sbmg5iekf9n5zFsvnQ7bVT6saycxur0de1 IZSMXzlDfwvoS4yrNy2VfRvzabL4AvkY40VhLg0OfbY3LlEfavgrNUQ5ZOBO1pMRnjm4 XTXkf8qpYDOeMf151tLwH/JZBZpYpfk2SNVoQcde0Hprel9uUAd5ChB8YaknIvegmPjI qIl8QnF+h3sVU2qSAv9Qm1dSaxtCXxiTdErT5JaQSsuXrfy9UCRc6/x08/OYf+02K5dX +1Sw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7jSeeMaH8rjYA2gChz97M1oYZJPZlQwSAtAkiVQtnY8=; b=WkaRPxfSLhJaZKa6ttu0NEFnyjN44ftfy+ubPcRc8vE3ib0d7pTM2nGKVXImPrwLuZ zL2aX8IjaKdBLRt1tJcyzhpQe+aXfYajRZo0On9VI+K4r1waayQspwn59716RtL0Ksb/ xnvSRLP0jGielVKR4p3EqAf54yXXnTUwn9AMAThnzkNwFdUcvEG4VTP2QwG+51lyy11I shZQtDn1STYSaIfVvsd3bVgfTSYP0Dk7jMSeFsQ3GKkhL2sdfEXyZlPVO0xbA7Y72bLe K7NWTYMY4/Fj35XxvtqHENdojD/P8JwC6vQrr49E3E4tqPlXH4uPhqN0FP0fO+SFdgcr zw9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wKTfOSH/cRsBLQ1c3jjCMiHfgPFjpwcSx1bV8eo9cF75PDF8S tB3mbuYdShjhaLNgNYXw6YwIbfyvrC4aiaXnOwstVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtdFEQb4ljWuf/Tc9Ep0073poynUK/belAjHokohQ4LmmdCaebXdqdG22i+imkF4JivtEFvhfWLNjmUSG7oig=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3197:: with SMTP id c23mr1111885vsh.41.1641868763743; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:39:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3e1fe494-c86b-5181-6afb-128b05fec882@stpeter.im> <48043fa8-eb37-2f97-942c-500492664bb0@gmail.com> <e708572f-b678-f60c-ab84-c48e039926a7@stpeter.im> <95dd0e5a-c5f4-09d1-98b4-327978e21316@gmail.com> <1846FA24-9631-4622-9EE6-B0D4A2B505C3@kuehlewind.net> <CANk3-NCkDCqz2m5X0aLGXKYttZ3U8LK-YppsyHYK6TT0RDYgHw@mail.gmail.com> <8a648870-03ec-b4c2-426b-357022e94c05@cs.tcd.ie> <548366C9-4581-4D4F-8638-7A5F7B754D13@eggert.org> <CANk3-NA1+-46Q0QkV_cr7SNB_nKU3+vEqqK7dMtwmf12Efyaog@mail.gmail.com> <203C6967-5A21-4100-8A5A-EB64E67B33EC@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <203C6967-5A21-4100-8A5A-EB64E67B33EC@eggert.org>
From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:38:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CANk3-NAVzQ3MGd21mBTTW31DZPtipDa6xyE4LLhUdxi1fT60sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, rfced-future@iab.org, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e5a6e05d5455c79"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/AMVoplqgKxtCjgpvLmTP0LVtH5c>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Issue 143: RSAB mailing list archives
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 02:39:30 -0000

So, bringing it up to a summary level (my previous notes were about why we
do things in other places rather than personal opinion -- I'm generally
trying to stay neutral in these discussions)

Reasons people in this group want a mailing list archive so far:
* transparency
* being able to reference past discussions
* NEW to answer "Would these discussions not happen in the RSWG anyway?":
because it makes the RSAB begins to look like a black box where decisions
are made and minutes report high level summaries without the detailed
discussions that actually took place.
* It matches how the IETF operates (with a counter argument of "this isn't
an IETF WG")

Reasons against:
* free-conversations are easier where people don't have to worry about
being quoted/attributed
* it sets a precedence (though counter arguments have essentially asked
"for who?")

I'm sure I missed something.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email