Re: [Rift] Call for more volunteers to readability review of RIFT draft sections

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Mon, 24 February 2020 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528393A08DE for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:01:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pn4WMnv2KFnc for <rift@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 881ED3A08DC for <rift@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id z1so9016998iom.9 for <rift@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:01:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jLkcArEQZdNN6NSyOrlYrysh39P1+Cd7yLWXmCL3uRA=; b=RWDGXKLh5nrbYc9+vio9PLIyPxTQH+QKlgeUoWfG6/7LtIaqA9mwoUHTA+MUOfhsUl AmbrLgcabGK/BQcOQyaJbQ4jcP9dzU9e+Oqz/Q0sDQ2hT1x710XSx5dl1UT1loufwPBJ pJf3AnSMGR36C3Gxvv5vZBxKqs34nocuKxqZUSeMya5Z4/AEKsBxYPVhhvnBviWn/ZaE sV01ykQLB7Roi5C9/RHn663dcFypp5jHxirq5+jpe7mGPRN97c1XwVx0A3azzZdiq+KO D9iPjeWw9GVbS/cENcIli0H5l2MD/fmT6fliu8FxOF27+PJLu/3jdueDaqBk00EZwpOL NKaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jLkcArEQZdNN6NSyOrlYrysh39P1+Cd7yLWXmCL3uRA=; b=uHHeYzcUk9BKGDbuZnusmHXwxpdnfymE81WqrHoamZq41oHid2khhYqrz8NBxu4oKP mwNEMqV9S/zQHiiq8CuVxAXzSxrSU4rEddJK1xYZHrTu+C4vFbVQTjQyiVoUyQpAiHTb +8XBhVEXTRojlvYfEL0UstLQZXXaRjkx7OYh1unddMdZbmLdJhBXkWkaB5owwRyK1Csd Huh8kQGJ+f/9On8CBzuUkQW3G9IW+sxGB78NJa/cdRs8MnyjIf5ZEipB3aqZGnK6lPcA CibxkVrzskA7yw8bLW6k7Jd+8lJONetYBvKueNULiZUpiPDatiDggnGg/a7tj7RPZ0Wp jd2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXk1LxdJbT8jyLKdIctmvCSYKWxRodXtWKAhHwOq7g0IOWuJJjL 3dqKn/XKLL1KHR2K994jEG/S/YsceL5X0fIu6xgXAgC/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxkr4mi60k+FyM0NyyPM7WLC1Ev/A0DoAF2UQL7f4FSFbBuCPXcwDQ3fhnqDw1Uj44ZsqbsAoDVEOuqn9DC+Ro=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:930a:: with SMTP id k10mr31047905iom.132.1582524101607; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:01:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+wi2hMtTgz6fk5UP8cnS6Wd-F4pPeoHZgmGLfjeghtvS6-CBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hMtTgz6fk5UP8cnS6Wd-F4pPeoHZgmGLfjeghtvS6-CBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:00:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hPkKPs8MEqEc7HWBUjV45Yng=uQXDxG1vF0VYckm_VdZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: rift@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ecca19059f4c1af9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/nJJaPWQDmWKDV519VRyBSvFbSnE>
Subject: Re: [Rift] Call for more volunteers to readability review of RIFT draft sections
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:01:44 -0000

ok, readability reviews for sections

4.2.5
4.2.6
4.2.7
4.3
4.4

still outstanding for version -11

step up please

--- tony


On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:33 AM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can I please have some reviewers step forward so we can cover that
> remaining sections of ongoing -10 draft for the last IESG comments (we
> basically need a 3rd party read helping with smoothing the flow of text and
> improve general public readability mainly, fine-comb normative language, no
> hairy technical issues discussions or anything like this necessary)
>
> we have everything reviewed until 4.2.4
>
> we need reviews for 4.2.5 until 8
>
> good resolution in terms of size and stuff that belongs together would be
>
> 4.2.5
> 4.2.6
> 4.2.7
> 4.3
> 4.4
> 5.
> 6.
> 7.
>
> volunteers much appreciated
>
> --- tony
>
>
>
>