Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

The applicability statement, when it was originally produced, identified 
issues with RPL as it stood then for applicability in home and building 
automation. This kicked off the development of the RPL-P2P work, which 
is more or less complete. Therefore it is logical to refer to this work 
in the updated document.

Robert

On 06/02/2013 6:18 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> I suggest you leave the aim as it was in previous version RPL
> applicability in home and building,  sections of RPL-P2P and RPL-P2MP
> should be in the scope,
>
> AB
>
> On 2/6/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why you discuss peer-to-multipeer that it is in building use, while
>> you make the aim for RPL-P2P as only peer-to-peer for building
>> applicability?
>>
>> AB
>>
>> On 2/6/13, Anders Brandt <Anders_Brandt@sigmadesigns.com> wrote:
>>> Dear WG,
>>>
>>> The applicability statement document for home and building has been
>>> updated:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03
>>>
>>> At this time, the authors would like to ask that the document as adopted
>>> as
>>> a working group document.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>    Anders Brandt
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Roll mailing list
>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>

Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

Attachment: smime.p7s