IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 07 February 2013 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6043C21F854C for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 03:57:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmVyVY6AIFzs for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 03:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E0821F8496 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 03:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi8so2770246wib.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:56:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3BKZfyGljWX9JtPMyHe5MpQNlvJdx3KW6IY734kEv7o=; b=nkoiS2B147gLUTf+oCsRtlI01Rv457XsECB6H7raPlLExrV6/WlG3Dd30QLMqbxDih xGsLuJQrX9yHnxmPsND6vw+D9+24Pxjf0D6+Nc0DU3wQDMFzQsTBVlWEoKv71nkjdWzU 63AkUzCG2FV8Yc3OA0nTwZCcIk3kqieiDLASS10WemtVn6kDh6s962LNds5JErPXLtTG O65o6TtokwbuUy8XdVGsuQBlREbr7DZUP7AMrQSmsODeAbsfcy3HojxsIoBWzpVPH5JE UnJKVDUy1NwXh+2VxFqC48QdBE6QKn2pKqE5sLl0kKDSjEZMeyhJCkh005YsU7NV235u SG9w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.75.196 with SMTP id e4mr2061408wjw.44.1360238219290; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:56:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.101.70 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 03:56:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5112D246.4090703@gridmerge.com>
References: <03F31C213F2C6941BFDDBB4336E9E6CD0AD364D1@cph-ex1> <CADnDZ88yeDW1Wy521qZCfEnnfP03RpzdfHfC9=xUTy025nuWEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-j8uuM1=KpGYkOJXPqDn_evnY0+-9vFOHjj4ZgvStdag@mail.gmail.com> <5112D246.4090703@gridmerge.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:56:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88PSuXOj53BaGeTgX5QWUdJAGCf53u8-6s-vcfEBWJisA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb049c6dee84904d5212361"
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:57:01 -0000

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Robert Cragie
<robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>wrote:

> The applicability statement, when it was originally produced, identified
> issues with RPL as it stood then for applicability in home and building
> automation. This kicked off the development of the RPL-P2P work, which is
> more or less complete. Therefore it is logical to refer to this work in the
> updated document.
>
>
I agree that it is logical *to refer* and discuss applicability of RPL-P2P,
but don't agree to change the aim of the draft from RPL to RPL-P2P. Do you
think both protocols are similar, or do you think that RPL is not
applicabile for home applications, just RPL-P2P?

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email