Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

Hi Anders,

I do miss a discussion on the reliability of the P2P communication 
coupled to timeliness.
LLN have the property that links are lost during unknown periods. The 
path using the link is unusable during that period.
It takes some time before alternative paths are found and established.
Using multiple paths avoiding link duplication is essential to provide 
reliability with timeliness.

A simple frequently occurring example is the one-hop path from A to B.
The link can fail during seconds. Having an alternative two hop path 
routing a copy "simultaneously" will make quite a difference.

I understood that P2P routing includes multipath routing, and hope you 
will put some more emphasis on this aspect.

Greetings,

peter

Anders Brandt schreef op 2013-02-06 09:52:
> Dear WG,
> 
> The applicability statement document for home and building has been 
> updated:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03
> 
> At this time, the authors would like to ask that the document as
> adopted as a working group document.
> 
> Thanks,
>   Anders Brandt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll