Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A5421F897A for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:18:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMoCOnmrQJYp for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (we-in-x022b.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B35A21F8464 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u54so1322633wey.2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:18:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LBRLwawg2z4G6GaUWtcCbsKGEa34LTA1yJiXUoBwcyY=; b=rrbop6d65vXWRPda1+ow7BA9sYWjFpugF48NA5zPzrhogoFK8kzlq7Tamw9isN2lME F+20IgN7jV/6ynoavtwIpWYzU3GX1+1wto9iRxcYJ/ydSlLD/EjavyMvvtphqZrbvXvo 7DT7FGFq6HeaaKAOE2omR+V1TJjbpO34d4teykUhYB6EStjlooUn6AarHXf+p0dm5SQG MeT1FudLWhyuYPNE4OaFvcEDXAIuMPCodtMEOvwvgK0juPCMMhHQ0IOuBCfU9gBClufg 1ShJh9ZTfg8Nk8nNY3X1mNXfNzXmnQoMnyP2pOgC7K7V0LZbLeuHUzRr5g//r66LvsRD NLLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.86.36 with SMTP id m4mr6776944wiz.5.1360174691665; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.101.70 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:18:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88yeDW1Wy521qZCfEnnfP03RpzdfHfC9=xUTy025nuWEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <03F31C213F2C6941BFDDBB4336E9E6CD0AD364D1@cph-ex1> <CADnDZ88yeDW1Wy521qZCfEnnfP03RpzdfHfC9=xUTy025nuWEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:18:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-j8uuM1=KpGYkOJXPqDn_evnY0+-9vFOHjj4ZgvStdag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Anders Brandt <Anders_Brandt@sigmadesigns.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:18:22 -0000

I suggest you leave the aim as it was in previous version RPL
applicability in home and building,  sections of RPL-P2P and RPL-P2MP
should be in the scope,

AB

On 2/6/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why you discuss peer-to-multipeer that it is in building use, while
> you make the aim for RPL-P2P as only peer-to-peer for building
> applicability?
>
> AB
>
> On 2/6/13, Anders Brandt <Anders_Brandt@sigmadesigns.com> wrote:
>> Dear WG,
>>
>> The applicability statement document for home and building has been
>> updated:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03
>>
>> At this time, the authors would like to ask that the document as adopted
>> as
>> a working group document.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Anders Brandt
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>