Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

Hi Peter

> I understood that P2P routing includes multipath routing, and hope you will put some more emphasis on this aspect.

Thanks for the input - Good point!
I will make sure to get that into the next version.

- Anders

-----Original Message-----
From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of peter van der Stok
Sent: 11. februar 2013 15:07
To: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Adoption of draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building as a new ROLL WG document

Hi Anders,

I do miss a discussion on the reliability of the P2P communication coupled to timeliness.
LLN have the property that links are lost during unknown periods. The path using the link is unusable during that period.
It takes some time before alternative paths are found and established.
Using multiple paths avoiding link duplication is essential to provide reliability with timeliness.

A simple frequently occurring example is the one-hop path from A to B.
The link can fail during seconds. Having an alternative two hop path routing a copy "simultaneously" will make quite a difference.

I understood that P2P routing includes multipath routing, and hope you will put some more emphasis on this aspect.

Greetings,

peter

Anders Brandt schreef op 2013-02-06 09:52:
> Dear WG,
> 
> The applicability statement document for home and building has been
> updated:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-bu
> ilding-03
> 
> At this time, the authors would like to ask that the document as 
> adopted as a working group document.
> 
> Thanks,
>   Anders Brandt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll