Re: [Roll] Draft Agenda

[JeongGil Ko <[e-mail]>]

Michael,

Thanks for the clarification. However, this information still doesn't explain why Industrial Deterministic Routing Extension for Low-Power and Lossy Networks is on the agenda and draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology is not on the agenda. I believe draft-ko-roll-mix-network-pathology had more discussions that the other on the mailing list on whether or not this feature was needed in RPL.

-John

------
JeongGil Ko, Ph.D.
Researcher
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)
http://sites.google.com/site/jeonggilko/

On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> 
> Please be aware that among JP and I, I'm the one pushing loudest to 
> restrict our meeting slot time to (in order of priority):
> 
> 1) things in our charter.
> 2) things with activity on the mailing list.
> 3) things with reproduceable problem statements that might need
>  to go into the charter.
> 
> You may have noticed how incredibly full the IETF meetings are.
> 
> The Area Directors have been pushing very hard on the WG chairs 
> to make sure that we understand that the IETF sessions are *not* for
> presentations, but for discussion.
> 
> So, again: If there is work that you think has relevance to the
> ROLL WG, then please bring it up on the list.  
> If it's not controversial, then we don't need to discuss it.
> 
> If it's very controversial, then we need to pin down the set of concerns
> we have with it, so that, next week, when are together, we can focus
> on the actual issues.  We aren't there to watch powerpoints.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works 
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>