IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] Q on the congestion awareness of routing protocols

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 06 December 2022 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90171C152585; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Mj8Wv1jc8g9; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B0DC14E514; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id w15-20020a17090a380f00b0021873113cb4so16003205pjb.0; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:54:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dXzyIKzivhOLvXGiD4ykpKNP3MyrT0uJvtex6PCVelU=; b=IepT2F2qOt57wnUTRwRrGT6W+PFOStXuc5VYpR59p7HoGKnTKGk4IfaKOAfL1/8nzb kZ6sfXas1mfUI0HjG8glt3skbOspkNqmyOcEvXUtiHd40aB98zpdequ9Rs0Rvx3y+jdZ //IwJin629Kwwl9Vs6Ha8LBHjaVN3KIOrST5ZFclaT+UE5/tuuWO2R1Hcalp9XGoJzFm V8nRUPoT7Pn3axFcmanR4syghw3EZltHhdgDdS6XOapJmGnv7ptDS8JV30BX3bWNj0bo r35MsDbHlEtHvD+gGKtLlaeo2s6gi+UA8i2jSVK7uGQ60THxz5UYSCunnqXGLiAHmoZR W78Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dXzyIKzivhOLvXGiD4ykpKNP3MyrT0uJvtex6PCVelU=; b=SNkm1zd6RIw53+jwgFgmyO9LNib6WVKTidfgbLgZMlVg1jPYCchh4zYn0A3lJQWXKi IJsvYqym0ApdPvT6RoIRFppM5+h97hVJqpHqZ8Zq0/bVZyvnxVyMwakCVPbE0HSEtTkF Mb/49rnqMCgYrBm4y1m2/R0oJ6XemzooNDKfqHK0sq0sLl30HsP9ommqqBf6i/Vo0x4f H2tst2cMDd6NBRK/G19rFSpnPE6f/GGb6eViNjxgqUXPCx2Jc8LoyNYnXOtUj3hjWgZv 7Nj4cRpwQg/CGrG5DhussPo3sz3ZkWB+bCIg0taF3lnOU5mAAoTGMZxxOfu44sAJuIDO VuwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkLuoUonN+/3NDuTBXuVBYTB8GvaU7veMDh2MxZjQX0Clo5jI46 hoZx6VxaVuEwBNI1SFmuDJc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7Cl89w32NBAR1x4CV1CN9/tZzJ6O9e7AXu7kki6GKRt3Gp4xBmrlNMewhyR4AV9J7gpvmnTw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ccce:b0:189:d0d5:e75b with SMTP id z14-20020a170902ccce00b00189d0d5e75bmr13456381ple.163.1670360098788; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-98-234-33-188.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.234.33.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g23-20020aa796b7000000b00575d1ba0ecfsm3861619pfk.133.2022.12.06.12.54.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Subject: Re: [pim] Q on the congestion awareness of routing protocols
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1p2SAw-006HQa-3s@mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:54:57 -0800
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Matt Mathis <mattmathis=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>, tsv-area@ietf.org, pim <pim@ietf.org>, routing-discussion@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D989E7C-EBFB-42C4-9D55-F934A1437B19@gmail.com>
References: <CAH56bmBnqi4peTWUXOVy0KRRXRc1L7TP+atFfVF6qb_OKBMBwg@mail.gmail.com> <C303F9BF-F96A-4710-A4B5-4228807C07F7@gmail.com> <52907137-CA5A-4042-AB2C-23FD9B032210@gmail.com> <E1p2SAw-006HQa-3s@mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Jon Crowcroft <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/xqMGLWXyIW2Hp84Nx3-Y8iEVh80>
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area General Discussion list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/routing-discussion/>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:55:03 -0000

> path exploration? but consider the shadow pricing...

Just something semi-formal where we can meet regularly. But first, please lets articuulate the problem very clearly. And bring operators in so they can confirm the problem that researchers are stating are real problems that need solving.

> the tradeoff between convergence rate and congestion control seems to
> be something that ought to be put on a more systematic grounding

Agree.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email