Re: [rrg] Terminology

Somebody argues that LISP is an edge-centric (i.e., CES) solution, then what
about LISP-MN? Meanwhile, somebody argues that HIP and RANGI are
host-centric (i.e., CEE) solution, then what about HIP proxy and RANGI proxy
mechanisms? 

IMHO, these two options are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, they
should be complementary for each other. Each one is suitable for its
corresponding stage of the Internet architecture evolution path.

Xiaohu

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] 代表 Noel
> Chiappa
> 发送时间: 2010年2月4日 11:32
> 收件人: rrg@irtf.org
> 抄送: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
> 主题: Re: [rrg] Terminology
> 
> Someone pointed out to me that although I've been using the terms CEE and
CES
> as synonomous for the terms 'host-centric' and 'edge-centric' (and
> 'network-centric' completes the list), that for others they seemingly
aren't
> exactly synonomous, but subtly different.
> 
> Can someone confirm this, and explain what the differences are?
> 
> I'll be using 'host-centric', etc from now on. My apologies if I have
> inadvertently caused any confusion by using them as synonyms for
'host-centric'
> and 'edge-centric'.
> 
> 	Noel
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg