IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Terminology

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 04 February 2010 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E9828C1B2 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 05:33:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQiYEZkTEHXi for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 05:33:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C1828C1AE for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 05:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so196738qwd.7 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:33:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=OmU/ji4/8dtl4TDYhKVldGKlNlS6HobnZ9VxiCE2Amk=; b=rxUsjSlwFgM+rqrC/ogdgQkCF+qS0vFH6GbCb4lLBO6R5XSkvlgr5iFGDPOpEE3oKw 6NXMUorPWIJXKOHiCYWZ0If0Soj8olLkHWIrI2/IlPAGJFYtoBFM72YYFDHJHDyx5Cl+ /Amboqqd8T9uVIBsbr/lCuJ/J6Tjx02UIMH8I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=DsXzcYfXUv5Rg2NQC8hhhjkDJlmjgqAmO43JpxdviDx+792BtK6TZYEpStvp6FmEBb Y//HLln2ctxcdw4CKh4p68Lagyu52z7VSUkMOAOGOQSE7fJNhNN9+TYRHVLEkfMIJCHx jitub7OiqMJ7v5tDpxlzLDltx1mzlZ/6uyROc=
Received: by 10.224.18.79 with SMTP id v15mr110555qaa.181.1265290439480; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.30.20.3? (pool-70-104-194-109.nrflva.fios.verizon.net [70.104.194.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm495092qwi.25.2010.02.04.05.33.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:33:58 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100203235009.2DC456BE5DF@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:33:57 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A31D458-EB43-42FC-810A-381894D3C6C9@gmail.com>
References: <20100203235009.2DC456BE5DF@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Terminology
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:33:19 -0000

On 03  Feb 2010, at 18:50 , Noel Chiappa wrote:
> ...[the term CEE/CES] tells you whether one needs to modify hosts or not.

I don't believe that is necessarily true.  Others seem to agree with me.

If one means precisely that "host changes are required", then one ought to say 
"host changes are required", rather than invent confusing new terminology.

Yours,

Ran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email