Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support

Magnus said:

"I would guess that the simplest is to remove discussion of TURN TCP
altogether from Transports. That would not recommend it nor make it
disallowed. If we want to be explicit, then simply motivate why we don't
believe it necessary."

[BA] Removing a recommendation from the Transport document is OK with  me.
However, since we've had quite a bit of discussion on this topic, it would
be good to state why we don't believe it to be necessary (so as to avoid
rehashing this down the line).

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:

> On 2014-03-06 14:34, Simon Perreault wrote:
> > Le 2014-03-06 13:23, Justin Uberti a écrit :
> >> can we agree that TURN TCP candidates are a SHOULD NOT?
> >
> > Not a SHOULD, sure. SHOULD NOT, no.
> >
>
> I would guess that the simplest is to remove discussion of TURN TCP
> altogether from Transports. That would not recommend it nor make it
> disallowed. If we want to be explicit, then simply motivate why we don't
> believe it necessary.
>
> Justin, what is the reason you wanted SHOULD NOT?
>
> cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>