IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BD1A025E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:11:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVuSHyIcjIrq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22d.google.com (mail-ve0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9831A02A7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oy12so2587951veb.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:11:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=sUHq2aUOUkqzLwlaiCJJn4ZKW6aJ5w8hO/lCZdSyRfE=; b=QqZFGezjtR3dVh/2GcOjUtHDjWdNygrzBEGDXoqmHNtYPaPglcewPqkPXViZBivS9h fu/SoUp3+H3FDEG+MItj1cM6eGfM9z4GqrOmKe1WzELmIvj+cBvCYZXUSdWSzmKoxS55 N3ym9I38YqY2MZbF1yO26E9QCxg0rQ4o6+w3eAy53sNQm+1akrJYkYv7TqJuNpSWAcJN WUEUTeD/RMj9jFZdkYEF7Q/MIC1+V5y+p/SB52giFjfu9PgH6FGmPHrJWQ1+X/oWItib OdEUC+2F2WLXB1Urn/gl9YdeP0af/cMk71RlsfRSxrC/zbyeXXEIIK+llLcnnK8ksSzF bA5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=sUHq2aUOUkqzLwlaiCJJn4ZKW6aJ5w8hO/lCZdSyRfE=; b=gXN2iWxW3imPzqhrK5YQex7nu05NIVdmJY41YnjEXwiS3BPMnQM1Iq5k4Sd8U7KXYK yH+kLD4AhX/+bN1DzG4iVQrJxRr2zDqsYzCZerREz9k2TWraH5KFWO1Mlted2YxUhuSp MvOEMFgoQ3EttfKHzgN528WYr9KpQvou0KHSTaiY+YxzZWOyVxhXtPb4U3tfnnCCNtKe UEzZxnhNqcgH1oQNnprx+MUoarBnkVXwohfwKHl/KZVf574+gJddIQPqSpBHh1iSORjH 1weGbMjYYd8P5C6HEz3iEKjAA1ePKh1opzr4XiiUfEsQfOIMVUCgKcVRDVbkFo1HNCYl cmrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9Wl1FTG8eKTgNcULGFTe+AJ7TiUBqyzmXMxTC4Bl2Fxuw6ZOhM2P5Vqn0gjobyZnJ/qni8CMAKTID4aThAkWX0xqQyKhzHBE81gZBMhVeB4ESobHy3m+OS64muRB/tgcYPRHBjFSHA/EUuXMaZoKNkyl668oTeJJHUOOEx//RvdY0k9jmDAav2TNSq9grHCh3zNMz
X-Received: by 10.52.15.132 with SMTP id x4mr1607043vdc.31.1394111502118; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:11:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.26.43 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:11:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <53183BBB.3040409@viagenie.ca>
References: <CAOJ7v-0-U8ycUYcOwRGxgZVDQmdPMXC4Qt7F+uAn29AGOepX7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABAmMA00xA1TbXsQRYYnuukYyurZzdG8nKr95aT4gxHxQtNiMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0xiG-omwmpXm9koakab+EDFo7W=gW+WY4fGS6QVKfALQ@mail.gmail.com> <4A409D06-511D-424D-8285-E38B3E08292D@skype.net> <53177A5E.7030704@viagenie.ca> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4844FABAB0B@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <53183BBB.3040409@viagenie.ca>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:11:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1ZN=N5w3hFRkrC+LzarGFnt0qimcJbkTxWy6z0vWZFDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30334741dc851604f3efe02d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/WDhMdsdI6iYFhfABi1vd3X6ZVZQ
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:11:51 -0000

I would expect that corp or ISP servers would also be located very close to
the endpoint.


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
> wrote:

> Le 2014-03-05 20:39, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) a écrit :
> > TRAM is solving the "without the assistance of the JavaScript" case
> (finding corporate servers or ISP servers)... I'm sure that some of the
> larger RTCWEB application providers will be more than capable of figuring
> out which TURN servers will be best to assign to their customers.
>
> Right. So the "TCP on the short legs, UDP on the long leg" argument
> currently only holds for large application providers.
>
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email