Re: [rtcweb] CNAMEs and multiple peer connections

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 10 March 2014 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CCC1A0447 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-B77bZIbQZj for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700F21A0437 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id x13so8770259wgg.33 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=95v1CFzLtJCMvXlTTIV9/LE19VxVZhmzEqPxF+cK9ZY=; b=TxFAfG5MHbv0owY8s7+9TzNd5yvL9VgDuz1AKoMTflEWXicRDy9RfOEReNa+6mPJop nahrcIcI3ODzrzWr3W46HbDFy8BzTOwzk6mnQZUhN8MFJutyK9yHSDBYWBuw1FgswOZY LXrY3Hiv9jcVwmiEJesnAkRHtt2ngIl/avjmhwTW6bKTsHj6xT+8OqR0gKrRXTR0HPIQ L9SfqLIX+SZysieWW/ae+aEptHsTMn0zALZ3g1HC7gTB+uLPD3CGzWdq6GCpy0qcsXKe F6nDdTcJ0XvlfnbD9DJOOJPfS50i79E0GfNWEG1oWqWSI9v2zFF7Bika2/msGw1jnYaZ Blvg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.77.129 with SMTP id s1mr8189981wiw.56.1394462653636; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <531DCF44.1000203@ericsson.com>
References: <CABkgnnWGQ7GtKd33iF-RNbkeAyqKYshaPDDB=sAh5o-izKichQ@mail.gmail.com> <C702F0CB-0BBF-4A55-97A7-EC44FFAAC62B@cisco.com> <CABkgnnUaHHZqdsA5VQY9HgO-iJESOKfbhkgBqNdMYYGGMsHNuA@mail.gmail.com> <531DCF44.1000203@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:44:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVHsRWzeHozc6mmzjZKfQ72=-+hco3AAY5m0Hk=x4GWNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/1OQvLN8vuvJzymeW4DIzcy1uexo
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] CNAMEs and multiple peer connections
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:44:21 -0000

On 10 March 2014 15:42, Magnus Westerlund
<magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> A longer-term persistent RTCP CNAME is sometimes useful to
>> facilitate third-party monitoring, consistent with [RFC3550].
>
> Yes, but that is clearly not suitable for WebRTC.

I'm sure that's not the only thing it's unsuitable for.