Re: [rtcweb] CNAMEs and multiple peer connections

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 06 March 2014 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6B21A00A2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:43:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMZmpYUMG6sh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545941A0064 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FF27C3239 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:43:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ciFbRjn1S3MQ for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:43:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [31.133.178.19] (dhcp-b213.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.178.19]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 089C57C3234 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:43:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <53189785.60300@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:43:01 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CABkgnnWGQ7GtKd33iF-RNbkeAyqKYshaPDDB=sAh5o-izKichQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWGQ7GtKd33iF-RNbkeAyqKYshaPDDB=sAh5o-izKichQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/D1v0fQX2Ysuq7YXeZNTZANCkTJs
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] CNAMEs and multiple peer connections
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:43:14 -0000

On 03/05/2014 11:04 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I haven't thought about this in detail yet, but I wanted to ensure
> that this issue is tracked.  I think that our chairs might be able to
> create an issue in some tracker.  Can I request that they do that for
> this issue?

This is the issue of whether one should (MUST/SHOULD/MAY/MUST NOT) use
the same CNAME for RTP media streams created in different PeerConnections?

In particular, if one does

  pc1.addStream(s)
  pc2.addStream(s)
  pc1.<connect procedure to X>
  pc2.<connect procedure to Y>

will the same CNAME be shown to both X and Y, or not?
And does the answer change if X and Y are the same (for some value of
"same")?


>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb


-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.