IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 04 December 2014 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7C31A01D8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:30:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pVZgYICIATNv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384321A016A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:29:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=855; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1417721396; x=1418930996; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=f7K2ug02f0dvQlHWlYeCoOI7/XfVBDr4ezgpdnLL9V8=; b=agMRRsyB1INAkELIqRY7Dsc5xITCuT40QigvEAGmAkHkxLntooV/U7LP yrnvn/CZ/+NtD9a44XtPy/cvmCWnY4YpxHoPCdMNOOtMyPtFYwHBpcPfd Wjf0w4Vy/JseRmiVvI+PoKKwQyeDn7bEBfan3t9N1Y0g77/SmVCX0YmdY M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAMy1gFStJV2R/2dsb2JhbABZgmQigS7MZ4EhFgEBAQEBfYQJHR0/EgE+QicEDh+IJAHXOwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGJAEEQFQgyuBHgWQEIpKgSODLYJyjFaDeYF7OYEAAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,517,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="102755106"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2014 19:29:55 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB4JTrp9030245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:29:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([fe80::8c1c:7b85:56de:ffd1]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:29:52 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
Thread-Index: AQHQD/is2LdRMrUKckucyL6VrCW5HA==
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:29:52 +0000
Message-ID: <4114C519-5B41-43B5-8426-E6191398BE4D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <36EF9A1E3AF0D342B7E351C080B06A82@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/9yNd8faljM9TvpEM_w9HOqJBtGM
Subject: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:30:06 -0000

Having reviewed the fine technical comments on this draft since we asked for comments, the chairs have noted that multiple people seem to have read the draft. Given this great news we are going make a call for adoption. 

If you have an opinion, please email the list by Dec 19 and let us know if you either:

A) yes, draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways should be adopted as a WG document now

B) no, not right now 

If we get consensus around A we will work with ADs on milestone. Otherwise we will encourage the authors to keep working on this draft and continue using this email list. We may adopt it later or include the text in other drafts. 

Thanks, 
The Chairs (Cullen, Sean, Ted)

PS - if you want to send an email that says more than A or B, feel free to change the subject, start a new thread etc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email