IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Please require user consent for data channels

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Mon, 20 July 2015 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E601A86FE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCTx2PXx58Ki for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41761A891C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so27989430wic.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=loQNwsD/jbItcJUja+WtJDaJkNHjs1R0gQlcvXHMOxs=; b=dphCzzgVo2nlU48Ldri/ar3hMBfoNFdEPt+AT4Zh2zLyJxoAxJclWgOnJaaitVHXVg FV2BZKC1Jt1zbvhcIJ+gEHUS3fefx/S/N3wkoNZ4IifGs1FUYu8FQsqrXtMTu3W9ByJY GUpnTRRxeJTaap+excqyi2RqG48kap8cEqck6Czjl6MvBYtjRNaAS48Ky6+tkmX9nQbC SM4XmGX00fUVS8Qta1r8cmjityE1oWCBosTWQgKYhv60a3Ov+ghaZxsRXLp/STnt2jep uUoR+XtYl/uNkXrfZZoNjKpej3kt/LHXqQuk1XJniWhF6jz2UtOk4FMMTFBzssxXj07X 9m+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnvx5JX4bYGQ5OR6MQHZOQsA8xoKhgCq62wABuqRBFhy/Dr7ih0rNl8Oavf20DuAtDnrZZH
X-Received: by 10.180.81.106 with SMTP id z10mr20934271wix.22.1437401650470; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b3b5.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:176:8c28:2ddb:9d64:1c21]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id pn6sm32201917wjb.36.2015.07.20.07.14.09 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55AD0230.5010903@jive.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:14:08 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CA+65OspMD_PVjk0BXh7t4LtjmFDcDatoeNjFQOO_OVtC-Br+OA@mail.gmail.com> <55A96DA3.1040907@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1ui7349NzK6NZNRHPbnHWZajctk4cDgMKqRZSv47EYdA@mail.gmail.com> <55A9860D.8030903@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3LGd32rnpFVW_U0s3+iVaJXsL4vt_YAo=cyp6YyOArdw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmiS18Jux-kCgOhTKKiyGtMertj6xCegpFrox5NOf9EJg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW0Tmjqz823vKiF84_u6HasBJC7ERMYCO2HL_NPj5saTA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkpbLy1QXxr-RRF0oOpVv1sWsFeab=vvC4iT4DnPtjKQw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVWcuhX2NjZgx87L+Uo6df6rEBWW73cxbaX3mu_VfHmCA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkQWAn-jMrjhcDPA3rtowOPVk-S8z3c-jvjpNmjtf=3hA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWERM4oxozNCSvRf1o0Wm-d9Bjw=9B+xh_NJ+h6GfBJ6Q@mail.gmail.com> <7F818FAC-5559-4074-B1FC-EB9516A98FB7@phonefromhere.com> <13F9D9AE-7B6B-40DE-BDD7-DDED28382EAB@phonefromhere.com> <55ACF718.3010000@jive.com> <55ACFEFE.3030108@jive.com> <CALiegfnCnCoKC4hWGPG_w+AcfAGgsF6FoNsuJEg8PBktibHE2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnCnCoKC4hWGPG_w+AcfAGgsF6FoNsuJEg8PBktibHE2g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/AugwgAzsO0nDRSmRM588NPFOzsU>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Please require user consent for data channels
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:14:13 -0000

Le 2015-07-20 16:09, Iñaki Baz Castillo a écrit :
> So we are talking about whether the browser should just try the OS
> preferred route capable of reaching the STUN server or all the capable ones.

Correct. Thanks for re-focusing the discussion.

As for this precise question, I don't have an opinion. My intuition is
it would perhaps make sense to reflect routing priorities into ICE
prioritization or nomination criteria. But that would be very
implementation-specific.

Simon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email