IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Please require user consent for data channels

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 20 July 2015 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95121A21B2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wmwisg1c56ms for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696DA1A6F1E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbij6 with SMTP id ij6so83176505igb.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5IO+5wY20GhjizZBxUrwkgwlKtcTfCuPYymENp96bEc=; b=bmsShXcCHWT+BYa9kj6DB1OjM2z50nMaKDlLvpyH5bW2hIaNI29sH7m1jPnmM+LILg 9ERs7LFemJT20SyYdoeyN4qnNwOPYwsSi41GdpKJGlaxDeO5A5xd+7b0iSCWEGw18LHX 9vkHjAVvkrDwduO5bU/8glqWaD7/8l/qzUaEBefqh3B0K/KnK8joeETv6Thx8uTkYSbL pZwlUN0Jua/qQmZFnaftzti8b0R+3J6pc75InlKgAaC2F2hHv4P6Kf/R+ke4plegL54c mQOMbFTEJoKhzHGLCPaYLNW3a6refGVCqTjh1HBdxpNKm3rUh5HaShNINTiZUMBtUcHg 9bEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwThXv1lJGMOfNdYpEd/+CqdQyHhOAq0CFnXklm+jKkF8laTqSTksPPFMaWk5kkINytoUn
X-Received: by 10.50.138.73 with SMTP id qo9mr15673141igb.64.1437401762932; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com. [209.85.213.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rj5sm5327697igc.2.2015.07.20.07.16.00 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so38301888igb.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.50.229 with SMTP id f5mr15247652igo.35.1437401760473; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.89.70 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55ACFEFE.3030108@jive.com>
References: <CA+65OspMD_PVjk0BXh7t4LtjmFDcDatoeNjFQOO_OVtC-Br+OA@mail.gmail.com> <55A95364.2070806@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3t9BQabR2e4EHs4G0Sec4sU9DFC2aiSXXYrat+an+RYg@mail.gmail.com> <55A96DA3.1040907@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1ui7349NzK6NZNRHPbnHWZajctk4cDgMKqRZSv47EYdA@mail.gmail.com> <55A9860D.8030903@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3LGd32rnpFVW_U0s3+iVaJXsL4vt_YAo=cyp6YyOArdw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmiS18Jux-kCgOhTKKiyGtMertj6xCegpFrox5NOf9EJg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW0Tmjqz823vKiF84_u6HasBJC7ERMYCO2HL_NPj5saTA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkpbLy1QXxr-RRF0oOpVv1sWsFeab=vvC4iT4DnPtjKQw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVWcuhX2NjZgx87L+Uo6df6rEBWW73cxbaX3mu_VfHmCA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkQWAn-jMrjhcDPA3rtowOPVk-S8z3c-jvjpNmjtf=3hA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWERM4oxozNCSvRf1o0Wm-d9Bjw=9B+xh_NJ+h6GfBJ6Q@mail.gmail.com> <7F818FAC-5559-4074-B1FC-EB9516A98FB7@phonefromhere.com> <13F9D9AE-7B6B-40DE-BDD7-DDED28382EAB@phonefromhere.com> <55ACF718.3010000@jive.com> <55ACFEFE.3030108@jive.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:16:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuwVcHsij8fDbvcTqhh-Fq=XatHSqkizF_b592Pj2RymA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd752e4552ce1051b4f2d2d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/HkKJrNqZ3_V3C6VlbBNNoPSyYiM>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Please require user consent for data channels
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:16:04 -0000

Just to be completely clear, we are talking about the metric parameter in
the route. If I set a lower metric on the route to some destination (or if
OS sets a lower metric on the route to some destination), I expect this
route to be used. On some operating systems, this can be overwritten by
explicitly binding to a particular IP address (interface). This breaks
things and is somewhat unexpected to the system administrator. This is also
something that only happens in case of ICE. No other browser based protocol
would send data over a route with higher metric.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email