Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

I support adoption and will participate in the discussion.

As others have said the auto-discovery is an issue that should be discussed in TRAM and this draft should reflect the conclusion to that discussion.

Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> Sent: 16 April 2015 19:16
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
> 
> All,
> 
> There's been some interest expressed in having
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return/ adopted
> as an RTCWeb WG item.  Please respond to say whether you support
> adoption of this work as a working group work item and whether you will
> participate in the discussion.   If you are opposed to this draft
> becoming a WG document, please say so (and say why).  Please have your
> response in by 20150423 23:59 UTC.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> spt
> 
> PS - For the casual lurker, there was some vigorous discussion in
> Dallas on the -05 version but based on the [1] thread and the -06
> version it looks like we're in much better shape.
> 
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg14402.html
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb