IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Fri, 17 April 2015 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839191A905C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUizq8tsbL1h for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B94781A9041 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8450; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429237532; x=1430447132; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Z1a6+t7iIC7rVk+zVs2eARX32+Rtmb2rdIt7TxPdSoM=; b=l2Tf5KVY5aueS/seRqrlacNRiGwy2m1WKYuPObsrz0Dzuu1oQHDuphAv FzwWfeWynctv+rekrVGHZIW0HJ2O3nwOFDAuKTlyQApbVuvpovNPMDOfK 2EkgoNMUIVnxKB52oNBsGkh/FSJFdQzCGL4fIDd4b6XnALO0uK0SDbclA k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BVBQAYbjBV/4oNJK1dgkVHUlwFgxDCCII0AQmFNU4CHIE1TAEBAQEBAX6EIAEBAQQBAQEaBgpBCxACAQgRBAEBAQodAwICAh8GCxQJCAIEAQ0FCIgOAxENsiyQJQ2FLgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEiymCR4FqGhYXBAYBgmgvgRYFkRqITJAQhkEig29vgUR/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,591,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="412890107"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2015 02:25:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3H2PUA2023021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 02:25:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.220]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:25:30 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
Thread-Index: AQHQeHFuxye4rAeOEkGeqiNht+CucZ1QSlMAgAAB54CAAC6AYA==
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 02:25:29 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A412101FF@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <E9C40771-DA7B-48F1-959E-552454CCE83F@ieca.com> <CABkgnnVuHEQLswttvN4gwUXWhNnHv8Fiz1L+Bq55a4uWV9g85Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKhHsXFZ9e-dp0FuZvnFmDTvnj=ioSRhyU1DoxZLSu73JtuyjQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKhHsXFZ9e-dp0FuZvnFmDTvnj=ioSRhyU1DoxZLSu73JtuyjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.77.69]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A412101FFxmbrcdx10ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/tYm1wBcXf6ILJrfPv-9EkYamEto>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org" <draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 02:25:33 -0000

+1

-Tiru

From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alan Johnston
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:09 AM
To: Martin Thomson
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org; draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

I support adoption of the draft.

I'm also fine with the new text for now.  We need a good discussion about the security of TURN server auto discovery, but that should happen in TRAM where the auto discovery draft lives.  This RTCWEB draft can then be updated to align with that consensus.

- Alan -

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com<mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 16 April 2015 at 11:16, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com<mailto:turners@ieca.com>> wrote:
> PS - For the casual lurker, there was some vigorous discussion in Dallas on the -05 version but based on the [1] thread and the -06 version it looks like we’re in much better shape.

As I mentioned in the thread, I think that the new text is too
restrictive, but can live with being in the rough on this.

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email