IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Wed, 06 May 2015 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9081AD2C0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2015 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=1.675, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s8c9c2JkqtIa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2015 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway01.websitewelcome.com (gateway01.websitewelcome.com [69.41.248.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACFB81AD0C1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2015 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway01.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 3BE0C1556D7AD; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:33:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator3286.hostgator.com (gator3286.hostgator.com [198.57.247.250]) by gateway01.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC1E1556D759 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:33:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [173.73.121.66] (port=56642 helo=192.168.1.6) by gator3286.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1Yq1KG-0000FK-Ib; Wed, 06 May 2015 10:33:32 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9C40771-DA7B-48F1-959E-552454CCE83F@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 11:33:31 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EA852866-2FC0-4EED-B3FB-454A22BE1537@ieca.com>
References: <E9C40771-DA7B-48F1-959E-552454CCE83F@ieca.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3286.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 173.73.121.66
X-Exim-ID: 1Yq1KG-0000FK-Ib
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (192.168.1.6) [173.73.121.66]:56642
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IzMjg2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/lPpA2tRXuXGk9Cs_3aH9glgHUyw>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 15:33:35 -0000

All,

Based on messages to the list we’re going to adopt this draft as a WG item.

Authors,

Please submit a WG version of the draft when you have a chance.

spt

On Apr 16, 2015, at 14:16, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote:

> All,
> 
> There’s been some interest expressed in having http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return/ adopted as an RTCWeb WG item.  Please respond to say whether you support adoption of this work as a working group work item and whether you will participate in the discussion.   If you are opposed to this draft becoming a WG document, please say so (and say why).  Please have your response in by 20150423 23:59 UTC.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> spt
> 
> PS - For the casual lurker, there was some vigorous discussion in Dallas on the -05 version but based on the [1] thread and the -06 version it looks like we’re in much better shape.
> 
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg14402.html
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email