Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Thu, 16 April 2015 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4853B1B3452 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9fBmFeeANgMP for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vn0-x231.google.com (mail-vn0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F681B344F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vnbf1 with SMTP id f1so24521268vnb.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gleFsA/GLRbM6JJ5cmMgjn8pryWLwPjO1wVadBSQK3A=; b=fiwmf8xMyyU1szP78NuBfXmCa9n3O8ogjodDUoDCFLuL+f8Z1f+y+teI39n/Fbik17 UuAI7U0Q82HO3XeAoxFXas+YYugop+B2bdFPvSSDRyYtOMUDdTfGTSjJZ3C2FLeLmdZO DPMrR/0kODoNR9AW5XzELoo2e02bEbEETEI1stxduoTMTRIj1UMz7gFuloxwnw5wU+Rz gTE3l/qdEg0Z27jHTffOh/lPhnVxYTnqVha0DB+2CKYo6ZQcCjRJVSwDrhTrD6z23LBl g+GsneT3W9GmnJWhHBe8K+Y7SXg71Zh1K81e150D1JpgYSPYsfkisB22IO/g7uEM8Ty+ 4sfg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.115.132 with SMTP id jo4mr39782267vdb.43.1429209559841; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.133.7 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVuHEQLswttvN4gwUXWhNnHv8Fiz1L+Bq55a4uWV9g85Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E9C40771-DA7B-48F1-959E-552454CCE83F@ieca.com> <CABkgnnVuHEQLswttvN4gwUXWhNnHv8Fiz1L+Bq55a4uWV9g85Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:39:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKhHsXFZ9e-dp0FuZvnFmDTvnj=ioSRhyU1DoxZLSu73JtuyjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec548a7911fc1880513dbc817"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/o4KEJuRCIzeHtvdI3tpJ_6TRiNQ>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:39:22 -0000
I support adoption of the draft. I'm also fine with the new text for now. We need a good discussion about the security of TURN server auto discovery, but that should happen in TRAM where the auto discovery draft lives. This RTCWEB draft can then be updated to align with that consensus. - Alan - On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 April 2015 at 11:16, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote: > > PS - For the casual lurker, there was some vigorous discussion in Dallas > on the -05 version but based on the [1] thread and the -06 version it looks > like we’re in much better shape. > > As I mentioned in the thread, I think that the new text is too > restrictive, but can live with being in the rough on this. > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtc… Sean Turner
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Alan Johnston
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz… Sean Turner