Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

"Karl Stahl" <karl.stahl@intertex.se> Mon, 20 April 2015 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <karl.stahl@intertex.se>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2E41AD0BC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CMogGv48Sdr2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.it-norr.com (smtp.it-norr.com [80.244.64.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951A01AD0BB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([90.227.80.227]) by smtp.it-norr.com (Telecom3 SMTP service) with ASMTP id 201504201059374883; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:59:37 +0200
From: Karl Stahl <karl.stahl@intertex.se>
To: "'Hutton, Andrew'" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, 'Sean Turner' <turners@ieca.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <E9C40771-DA7B-48F1-959E-552454CCE83F@ieca.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E73A7CB@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E73A7CB@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:59:34 +0200
Message-ID: <03fd01d07b48$528b3160$f7a19420$@stahl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
thread-index: AQHQeHFuqzJQBRzJZkuSrnXI8T9yI51VnVkggAACIYA=
Content-Language: sv
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Qf6WbKdjYPbt-Q4CO2JmOuup5To>
Cc: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:59:41 -0000

I also support adoption and will participate in the discussion.

/Karl

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] För Hutton, Andrew
Skickat: den 20 april 2015 10:53
Till: Sean Turner; rtcweb@ietf.org
Kopia: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
Ämne: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

I support adoption and will participate in the discussion.

As others have said the auto-discovery is an issue that should be discussed
in TRAM and this draft should reflect the conclusion to that discussion.

Andy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> Sent: 16 April 2015 19:16
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return
> 
> All,
> 
> There's been some interest expressed in having 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return/ adopted 
> as an RTCWeb WG item.  Please respond to say whether you support 
> adoption of this work as a working group work item and whether you will
> participate in the discussion.   If you are opposed to this draft
> becoming a WG document, please say so (and say why).  Please have your 
> response in by 20150423 23:59 UTC.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> spt
> 
> PS - For the casual lurker, there was some vigorous discussion in 
> Dallas on the -05 version but based on the [1] thread and the -06 
> version it looks like we're in much better shape.
> 
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg14402.html
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb