Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not!
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 20 July 2011 11:10 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB1E21F8A70 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7JIXgnTUqZQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8DB21F8A66 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-4c-4e26b78ba4c0
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 59.40.20773.B87B62E4; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:10:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:10:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4E26B78A.7040609@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:10:02 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <4E259484.20509@ericsson.com> <4E26A49F.1070700@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <4E26A49F.1070700@alvestrand.no>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not!
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:10:13 -0000
On 2011-07-20 11:49, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > Magnus, I cannot parse your list of choices. > > In the case where you have > > Sender A > Recipient B > Three video streams going from A to B > Three audio streams going from A to B > One video stream going from B to A > One audio stream going from B to A > > with the application not requiring the network to treat the packets any > differently, and with the application using the CNAME mechanism to match > audio streams with corresponding video streams > > it is completely unclear to me whether your choice A) requires 8 > transport flows, 4 transport flows or 2 transport flows, and it is > completely unclear to me what C) actually means. (I assume "transport > flow" = "RTP sessions" here) > > Please - can you clarify what your question is intended to mean? With choice A I do mean that one for each RTP session use one UDP flow in each direction. And that these two UDP flows will be symmetric, i.e. a bi-directional UDP flow. This in contrast to B and C when you use some multiplexing to map all RTP sessions, independently of how many you have onto one bi-directional UDP flow. The above example you give is at least two RTP sessions, one for audio and one for video. It might be more than these two if the reason you are sending multiple video streams is because the streams should be differently treated, for example in a RTP mixer. Where you perform composition of video streams of the participants and simply switch a demonstration camera. Or it may be that entity A above is transport relay and it is forwarding the camera from three different conference participants and all video streams are the same RTP session. It is the application that has do make these choices about if it needs more than one RTP session or not. Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Dzonatas Sol
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Elwell, John
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] To multiplex or not! Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] Support for websockets Avasarala, Ranjit
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Christopher Blizzard
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Support for websockets Salvatore Loreto